Zhong Cuiyu, Chen Jiayi, Yan Ziyan, Xia Renfei, Zeng Wenli, Deng Wenfeng, Xu Jian, Wang Yuchen, Miao Yun
Department of Transplantation, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Transpl Immunol. 2023 Dec;81:101953. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101953. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
The selection of antiviral therapy for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection has been extensively debated. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of various treatments for BKPyV infection.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies regarding drug treatments for BKPyV viremia/DNAemia published between January 1, 1970 and September 30, 2022. Two independent authors screened the published studies, extracted pertinent data, and evaluated their methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software version 4.2.2.
A total of 33 published studies involving 986 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, therapeutic interventions comprised immunosuppression reduction alone or in combination with leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), cidofovir, or mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) therapy. The meta-analysis revealed that the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction alone for serum BKPyV clearance was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.77; I = 78%). Moreover, the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction in combination with leflunomide, cidofovir, IVIG, or mTORi therapy for serum BKPyV clearance was 61% (95% CI: 0.47-0.74; I = 83%), 71% (95% CI: 0.63-0.78; I = 0), 87% (95% CI: 0.82-0.93; I = 45%), and 80% (95% CI: 0.59-1.00; I = 58%), respectively. Compared to immunosuppression reduction alone, immunosuppression reduction combined with IVIG therapy offered a statistically significant benefit in serum BKPyV clearance (P < 0.01) with minimal adverse reactions, whereas other adjunctive drug treatments did not demonstrate considerable effects.
Reducing immunosuppression remains the primary approach for treating BKPyV infection. Although the combination treatment with IVIG proved to be most effective, other agents might offer varied antiviral advantages of high heterogeneity, which should be substantiated in future long-term randomized controlled trials.
BK多瘤病毒(BKPyV)感染的抗病毒治疗选择一直存在广泛争议。我们的研究旨在评估BKPyV感染的各种治疗方法的疗效和安全性。
我们在PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库中检索了1970年1月1日至2022年9月30日期间发表的关于BKPyV病毒血症/DNA血症药物治疗的相关研究。两位独立作者筛选了已发表的研究,提取了相关数据,并评估了它们的方法学质量。使用RevMan软件版本4.2.2进行荟萃分析。
荟萃分析共纳入33项已发表研究,涉及986例患者。总体而言,治疗干预措施包括单独降低免疫抑制或与来氟米特、静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)、西多福韦或mTOR抑制剂(mTORi)联合治疗。荟萃分析显示,单独降低免疫抑制清除血清BKPyV的疗效为68%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.58 - 0.77;I² = 78%)。此外,降低免疫抑制联合来氟米特、西多福韦、IVIG或mTORi治疗清除血清BKPyV的疗效分别为61%(95% CI:0.47 - 0.74;I² = 83%)、71%(95% CI:0.63 - 0.78;I² = 0)、87%(95% CI:0.82 - 0.93;I² = 45%)和80%(95% CI:0.59 - 1.00;I² = 58%)。与单独降低免疫抑制相比,降低免疫抑制联合IVIG治疗在血清BKPyV清除方面具有统计学显著益处(P < 0.01),且不良反应最小,而其他辅助药物治疗未显示出显著效果。
降低免疫抑制仍然是治疗BKPyV感染的主要方法。虽然联合IVIG治疗被证明是最有效的,但其他药物可能具有高度异质性的不同抗病毒优势,这应在未来的长期随机对照试验中得到证实。