Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Radiology, Yas Complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
BJOG. 2024 Oct;131(11):1435-1443. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17710. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
Brain anomalies (BAs) have been the focus of research, as they have a high impact on fetal health but therapeutic and diagnostic approaches are limited.
In this study, the application and efficiency of exome sequencing (ES) in detecting different cases of BAs in fetuses were evaluated and compared with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA).
To conduct this study, three databases including PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were utilised with the keywords 'prenatal', 'diagnoses', 'brain anomalies' and 'exome sequencing'.
Studies were included based on the STARD checklist, for which the ES and CMA diagnostic yields were calculated.
Meta-analysis was performed on the included studies using a random-effects model and subgroup analysis to define the risk difference between them.
We included 11 studies representing 779 fetuses that implemented ES along with imaging techniques. The pooled ES diagnostic yield in fetuses with BAs detected through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography was 26.53%, compared with 3.46% for CMA. The risk difference between ES and CMA for complex BAs was 0.36 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.47], which was higher than for single BAs (0.22; 95% CI 0.18-0.25].
ES is a useful method with a significantly higher diagnostic yield than CMA for genetic assessment of fetuses with complex BAs detected by imaging techniques. Moreover, ES could be applied to suspected fetuses with related family histories to predict congenital diseases with high efficiency.
脑异常(BAs)一直是研究的焦点,因为它们对胎儿健康有很大影响,但治疗和诊断方法有限。
本研究评估并比较了外显子组测序(ES)在检测胎儿不同脑异常病例中的应用和效率,与染色体微阵列分析(CMA)进行比较。
为进行本研究,使用了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Embase 三个数据库,使用的关键词是“产前”、“诊断”、“脑异常”和“外显子组测序”。
根据 STARD 清单选择研究,计算 ES 和 CMA 的诊断产量。
使用随机效应模型对纳入的研究进行荟萃分析,并进行亚组分析,以确定它们之间的风险差异。
我们纳入了 11 项研究,代表了 779 例同时进行 ES 和影像学技术的胎儿。通过磁共振成像(MRI)和超声检测到脑异常的胎儿中,ES 的汇总诊断产量为 26.53%,而 CMA 的诊断产量为 3.46%。ES 与 CMA 对复杂脑异常的风险差异为 0.36(95%置信区间(CI)0.24-0.47),高于对单一脑异常(0.22;95% CI 0.18-0.25)。
ES 是一种有用的方法,与 CMA 相比,对通过影像学技术检测到的复杂脑异常胎儿的遗传评估具有明显更高的诊断产量。此外,ES 可应用于具有相关家族史的疑似胎儿,以高效预测先天性疾病。