Suppr超能文献

与其他下呼吸道感染相比,不同 COVID-19 危重症变异期期间和之后的临床结局。

Clinical outcomes during and beyond different COVID-19 critical illness variant periods compared with other lower respiratory tract infections.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, H7 Medicin, Huddinge, H7 Infektion och Hud Sönnerborg, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2023 Nov 6;27(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04722-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is yet to be better understood how outcomes during and after the critical illness potentially differ between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants from other lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). We aimed to compare outcomes in adults admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the Wild-type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods with individuals admitted with other LRTI.

METHODS

Population-based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden, using health registries with high coverage, including ICU-admitted adults from 1 January 2016 to 15 September 2022. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality, 180-day post-discharge mortality, 180-day hospital readmission, 180-day days alive and at home (DAAH), and incident diagnoses registered during follow-up.

RESULTS

The number of ICU admitted individuals were 1421 Wild-type, 551 Alpha, 190 Delta, 223 Omicron, and 2380 LRTI. In-hospital mortality ranged from 28% (n = 665) in the LRTI cohort to 35% (n = 77) in the Delta cohort. The adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio (CSHR) compared with the LRTI cohort was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.53) in the Wild-type cohort, 1.53 (1.28-1.82) in the Alpha cohort, 1.70 (1.30-2.24) in the Delta cohort, and 1.59 (1.24-2.02) in the Omicron cohort. Among patients discharged alive from their COVID-19 hospitalization, the post-discharge mortality rates were lower (1-3%) compared with the LRTI cohort (9%), and the risk of hospital readmission was lower (CSHRs ranging from 0.42 to 0.68). Moreover, all COVID-19 cohorts had compared with the LRTI cohort more DAAH after compared with before the critical illness.

CONCLUSION

Overall, COVID-19 critical was associated with an increased hazard of in-hospital mortality, but among those discharged alive from the hospital, less severe long-term outcomes were observed compared with other LRTIs.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)变体与其他下呼吸道感染(LRTI)相比,在危重病期间和之后的结果有何不同。我们旨在比较在野生型、阿尔法、德尔塔和奥密克戎时期因 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)入住重症监护病房(ICU)的成年人与因其他 LRTI 入住 ICU 的个体的结果。

方法

这是一项基于人群的队列研究,在瑞典斯德哥尔摩进行,使用具有高覆盖率的健康登记处,包括 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 15 日期间入住 ICU 的成年人。结果是院内死亡率、出院后 180 天死亡率、180 天住院再入院、180 天存活且在家(DAAH)和随访期间登记的新发诊断。

结果

入住 ICU 的人数分别为 1421 例野生型、551 例阿尔法、190 例德尔塔、223 例奥密克戎和 2380 例 LRTI。院内死亡率范围为 LRTI 队列的 28%(n=665)至德尔塔队列的 35%(n=77)。与 LRTI 队列相比,野生型队列的校正特定病因死亡率比(CSHR)为 1.33(95%置信区间[CI] 1.16-1.53),阿尔法队列为 1.53(1.28-1.82),德尔塔队列为 1.70(1.30-2.24),奥密克戎队列为 1.59(1.24-2.02)。在 COVID-19 住院期间存活出院的患者中,出院后死亡率较低(1-3%),低于 LRTI 队列(9%),住院再入院风险较低(CSHR 范围为 0.42 至 0.68)。此外,与 LRTI 队列相比,所有 COVID-19 队列在危重病之前和之后的 DAAH 都更高。

结论

总体而言,COVID-19 危重病与院内死亡率的增加风险相关,但在从医院存活出院的患者中,与其他 LRTI 相比,观察到的长期结局不太严重。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f283/10629059/f1f4482eeb30/13054_2023_4722_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验