Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;9(10):815-827. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00260-7. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
COVID-19 is associated with increased risks of neurological and psychiatric sequelae in the weeks and months thereafter. How long these risks remain, whether they affect children and adults similarly, and whether SARS-CoV-2 variants differ in their risk profiles remains unclear.
In this analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies, we extracted data from the TriNetX electronic health records network, an international network of de-identified data from health-care records of approximately 89 million patients collected from hospital, primary care, and specialist providers (mostly from the USA, but also from Australia, the UK, Spain, Bulgaria, India, Malaysia, and Taiwan). A cohort of patients of any age with COVID-19 diagnosed between Jan 20, 2020, and April 13, 2022, was identified and propensity-score matched (1:1) to a contemporaneous cohort of patients with any other respiratory infection. Matching was done on the basis of demographic factors, risk factors for COVID-19 and severe COVID-19 illness, and vaccination status. Analyses were stratified by age group (age <18 years [children], 18-64 years [adults], and ≥65 years [older adults]) and date of diagnosis. We assessed the risks of 14 neurological and psychiatric diagnoses after SARS-CoV-2 infection and compared these risks with the matched comparator cohort. The 2-year risk trajectories were represented by time-varying hazard ratios (HRs) and summarised using the 6-month constant HRs (representing the risks in the earlier phase of follow-up, which have not yet been well characterised in children), the risk horizon for each outcome (ie, the time at which the HR returns to 1), and the time to equal incidence in the two cohorts. We also estimated how many people died after a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis during follow-up in each age group. Finally, we compared matched cohorts of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 directly before and after the emergence of the alpha (B.1.1.7), delta (B.1.617.2), and omicron (B.1.1.529) variants.
We identified 1 487 712 patients with a recorded diagnosis of COVID-19 during the study period, of whom 1 284 437 (185 748 children, 856 588 adults, and 242 101 older adults; overall mean age 42·5 years [SD 21·9]; 741 806 [57·8%] were female and 542 192 [42·2%] were male) were adequately matched with an equal number of patients with another respiratory infection. The risk trajectories of outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in the whole cohort differed substantially. While most outcomes had HRs significantly greater than 1 after 6 months (with the exception of encephalitis; Guillain-Barré syndrome; nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorder; and parkinsonism), their risk horizons and time to equal incidence varied greatly. Risks of the common psychiatric disorders returned to baseline after 1-2 months (mood disorders at 43 days, anxiety disorders at 58 days) and subsequently reached an equal overall incidence to the matched comparison group (mood disorders at 457 days, anxiety disorders at 417 days). By contrast, risks of cognitive deficit (known as brain fog), dementia, psychotic disorders, and epilepsy or seizures were still increased at the end of the 2-year follow-up period. Post-COVID-19 risk trajectories differed in children compared with adults: in the 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, children were not at an increased risk of mood (HR 1·02 [95% CI 0·94-1·10) or anxiety (1·00 [0·94-1·06]) disorders, but did have an increased risk of cognitive deficit, insomnia, intracranial haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorders, psychotic disorders, and epilepsy or seizures (HRs ranging from 1·20 [1·09-1·33] to 2·16 [1·46-3·19]). Unlike adults, cognitive deficit in children had a finite risk horizon (75 days) and a finite time to equal incidence (491 days). A sizeable proportion of older adults who received a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis, in either cohort, subsequently died, especially those diagnosed with dementia or epilepsy or seizures. Risk profiles were similar just before versus just after the emergence of the alpha variant (n=47 675 in each cohort). Just after (vs just before) the emergence of the delta variant (n=44 835 in each cohort), increased risks of ischaemic stroke, epilepsy or seizures, cognitive deficit, insomnia, and anxiety disorders were observed, compounded by an increased death rate. With omicron (n=39 845 in each cohort), there was a lower death rate than just before emergence of the variant, but the risks of neurological and psychiatric outcomes remained similar.
This analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 showed that the increased incidence of mood and anxiety disorders was transient, with no overall excess of these diagnoses compared with other respiratory infections. In contrast, the increased risk of psychotic disorder, cognitive deficit, dementia, and epilepsy or seizures persisted throughout. The differing trajectories suggest a different pathogenesis for these outcomes. Children have a more benign overall profile of psychiatric risk than do adults and older adults, but their sustained higher risk of some diagnoses is of concern. The fact that neurological and psychiatric outcomes were similar during the delta and omicron waves indicates that the burden on the health-care system might continue even with variants that are less severe in other respects. Our findings are relevant to understanding individual-level and population-level risks of neurological and psychiatric disorders after SARS-CoV-2 infection and can help inform our responses to them.
National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, The Wolfson Foundation, and MQ Mental Health Research.
COVID-19 与感染后数周和数月内出现神经和精神后遗症的风险增加有关。这些风险持续多久,它们是否对儿童和成人有类似的影响,以及 SARS-CoV-2 变体在风险特征上是否存在差异,目前仍不清楚。
在这项对 2 年回顾性队列研究的分析中,我们从 TriNetX 电子健康记录网络提取数据,该网络是一个来自医院、初级保健和专科提供者的医疗记录的国际匿名数据集网络,约有 8900 万患者(主要来自美国,但也来自澳大利亚、英国、西班牙、保加利亚、印度、马来西亚和中国台湾)。我们确定了一组在 2020 年 1 月 20 日至 2022 年 4 月 13 日期间被诊断患有 COVID-19 的任何年龄的患者队列,并将其与同期任何其他呼吸道感染的患者队列进行了倾向性评分匹配(1:1)。匹配是基于人口统计学因素、COVID-19 和严重 COVID-19 疾病的危险因素以及疫苗接种状况进行的。分析按年龄组(<18 岁[儿童]、18-64 岁[成人]和≥65 岁[老年人])和诊断日期进行分层。我们评估了 SARS-CoV-2 感染后 14 种神经和精神诊断的风险,并将这些风险与匹配的对照组进行比较。通过时变风险比(HR)表示 2 年风险轨迹,并使用 6 个月的恒定 HR 进行总结(代表随访早期的风险,这些风险尚未在儿童中得到很好的描述)、每个结果的风险范围(即 HR 恢复为 1 的时间)和两组之间的发病相等时间。我们还估计了在随访期间,每个年龄组中患有神经或精神诊断的患者中有多少人死亡。最后,我们比较了在 alpha(B.1.1.7)、delta(B.1.617.2)和 omicron(B.1.1.529)变体出现前后直接诊断为 COVID-19 的匹配患者队列。
我们确定了在研究期间有记录的 COVID-19 诊断的 1487712 名患者,其中 1284437 名(185748 名儿童、856588 名成人和 242101 名老年人;平均年龄 42.5 岁[21.9];741806[57.8%]为女性,542192[42.2%]为男性)与另一种呼吸道感染的患者进行了适当的匹配。感染 SARS-CoV-2 后的结果风险轨迹差异很大。虽然大多数结果在 6 个月后 HR 显著大于 1(除了脑炎;格林-巴利综合征;神经、神经根和神经丛疾病;和帕金森病),但它们的风险范围和发病相等时间差异很大。常见精神障碍的风险在 1-2 个月后(心境障碍 43 天,焦虑障碍 58 天)恢复到基线,随后与匹配的对照组达到相同的总体发病率(心境障碍 457 天,焦虑障碍 417 天)。相比之下,认知障碍(称为大脑雾)、痴呆、精神病性障碍和癫痫或癫痫发作的风险在 2 年随访结束时仍处于较高水平。COVID-19 后风险轨迹在儿童和成人之间有所不同:在 SARS-CoV-2 感染后的 6 个月内,儿童没有增加情绪(HR 1.02[95%CI 0.94-1.10])或焦虑(1.00[0.94-1.06])障碍的风险,但确实有认知障碍、失眠、颅内出血、缺血性中风、神经、神经根和神经丛疾病、精神病性障碍和癫痫或癫痫发作的风险增加(HR 范围为 1.20[1.09-1.33]至 2.16[1.46-3.19])。与成人不同,儿童的认知障碍有一个有限的风险范围(75 天)和一个相等的发病时间(491 天)。无论是在哪个队列中,接受神经或精神诊断的相当一部分老年人随后死亡,尤其是那些被诊断为痴呆或癫痫或癫痫发作的老年人。风险概况在 alpha 变体出现前后(每个队列 47675 人)相似。与 delta 变体出现后(每个队列 44835 人)相比,观察到缺血性中风、癫痫或癫痫发作、认知障碍、失眠和焦虑障碍的风险增加,并且死亡率增加。与 omicron 相比(每个队列 39845 人),死亡率低于变体出现前,但神经和精神结果的风险仍然相似。
这项对 COVID-19 确诊患者进行的 2 年回顾性队列研究分析表明,情绪和焦虑障碍的发病率增加是短暂的,与其他呼吸道感染相比,这些诊断并没有总体上的增加。相比之下,精神病性障碍、认知障碍、痴呆和癫痫或癫痫发作的风险持续存在。不同的轨迹表明这些结果有不同的发病机制。与成人和老年人相比,儿童的整体精神风险状况更为良性,但他们对某些诊断的持续较高风险令人担忧。在 delta 和 omicron 波中,神经和精神结局相似表明,即使在其他方面较轻的变体中,对卫生保健系统的负担可能仍会继续。我们的研究结果有助于了解 SARS-CoV-2 感染后神经和精神障碍的个体和人群风险,并为我们应对这些风险提供信息。
国家卫生与保健研究牛津健康生物医学研究中心、沃尔夫森基金会和 MQ 心理健康研究。