Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, MAHE, Manipal, India.
KMCH College of Physiotherapy, Kovai Medical Center Research and Educational Trust, Coimbatore, India.
Physiother Res Int. 2024 Jan;29(1):e2058. doi: 10.1002/pri.2058. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
Chronic neck pain is known to be caused by the weakness of the deep neck flexors and disturbances in the mechanoreceptors and the proprioceptors of the cervical spine. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) is hypothesized to balance the relative stiffness and weakness of the muscles and activate the mechanoreceptors and proprioceptors.
To investigate PNF techniques and the craniocervical flexor training (CCFT) techniques for pain and function in chronic neck pain.
A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 66 chronic mechanical neck pain patients randomly assigned to either the PNF or CCFT groups using block randomization for a duration of 4 weeks. Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck disability Index (NDI) and Active cervical range of motion (ACROM) were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention. Data were analysed using independent t test and MANOVA.
The mean difference scores for NPRS and NDI were 2.18 and 15.72 in PNF group and 2.26 and 15.76 in the CCFT groups, respectively. Both the groups showed a change that was statistically significant. Also, the mean differences for the ACROM in all the planes in both the groups were statistically significant. However, the between group changes did not reveal any statistical significance in this study except for the right rotation in the CCFT group (p = 0.01).
This study concluded that the PNF treatment is also beneficial to pain and function in treating chronic mechanical neck pain patients as its results stand similar to the CCFT treatment, which is already established to be a reliable tool to treat this condition.
慢性颈部疼痛已知是由深层颈部屈肌的无力以及颈椎的机械感受器和本体感受器的紊乱引起的。本体感觉神经肌肉促进法(PNF)被假设为平衡肌肉的相对僵硬和无力,并激活机械感受器和本体感受器。
研究 PNF 技术和颅颈屈肌训练(CCFT)技术对慢性颈部疼痛的疼痛和功能的影响。
对 66 例慢性机械性颈部疼痛患者进行了一项随机临床试验,这些患者使用区组随机化法分为 PNF 组或 CCFT 组,持续 4 周。在基线和干预 4 周后,分别使用数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和主动颈椎活动范围(ACROM)进行测量。数据使用独立 t 检验和 MANOVA 进行分析。
PNF 组的 NPRS 和 NDI 的平均差值评分分别为 2.18 和 15.72,CCFT 组分别为 2.26 和 15.76。两组均显示出统计学上显著的变化。此外,两组在所有平面的 ACROM 的平均差异均具有统计学意义。然而,除了 CCFT 组的右侧旋转(p=0.01)外,两组之间的变化在本研究中没有显示出任何统计学意义。
本研究得出结论,PNF 治疗对慢性机械性颈部疼痛患者的疼痛和功能也有益,因为其结果与 CCFT 治疗相似,CCFT 治疗已经被证明是治疗这种疾病的可靠工具。