Poeppelman Rachel Stork, Moore-Clingenpeel Melissa, Siems Ashley, Mitchell Diana L, Jani Priti, Stewart Claire
Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Children's National, Washington, DC, USA.
Teach Learn Med. 2025 Jan-Mar;37(1):56-63. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2269402. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
Ad hoc entrustment decisions reflect a clinical supervisor's estimation of the amount of supervision a trainee needs to successfully complete a task in the moment. These decisions have important consequences for patient safety, trainee learning, and preparation for independent practice. Determinants of these decisions have previously been described but have not been well described for acute care contexts such as critical care and emergency medicine. The ad hoc entrustment of trainees caring for vulnerable patient populations is a high-stakes decision that may differ from other contexts. Critically ill patients and children are vulnerable patient populations, making the ad hoc entrustment of a pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) fellow a particularly high-stakes decision. This study sought to characterize how ad hoc entrustment decisions are made for PCCM fellows through faculty ratings of vignettes. The authors investigated how acuity, relationship, training level, and task interact to influence ad hoc entrustment decisions. A survey containing 16 vignettes that varied by four traits (acuity, relationship, training level, and task) was distributed to U.S. faculty of pediatric critical care fellowships in 2020. Respondents determined an entrustment level for each case and provided demographic data. Entrustment ratings were dichotomized by "high entrustment" versus "low entrustment" (direct supervision or observation only). The authors used logistic regression to evaluate the individual and interactive effects of the four traits on dichotomized entrustment ratings. One hundred seventy-eight respondents from 30 institutions completed the survey (44% institutional response rate). Acuity, relationship, and task all significantly influenced the entrustment level selected but did not interact. Faculty most frequently selected "direct supervision" as the entrustment level for vignettes, including for 24% of vignettes describing fellows in their final year of training. Faculty rated the majority of vignettes (61%) as "low entrustment." There was no relationship between faculty or institutional demographics and the entrustment level selected. As has been found in summative entrustment for pediatrics, internal medicine, and surgery trainees, PCCM fellows often rated at or below the "direct supervision" level of ad hoc entrustment. This may relate to declining opportunities to practice procedures, a culture of low trust propensity among the specialty, and/or variation in interpretation of entrustment scales.
临时委托决策反映了临床主管对实习生当下成功完成一项任务所需监督量的评估。这些决策对患者安全、实习生学习以及独立执业准备具有重要影响。此前已描述过这些决策的决定因素,但在重症监护和急诊医学等急性护理环境中尚未得到充分描述。对照顾弱势患者群体的实习生进行临时委托是一项高风险决策,可能与其他情况有所不同。危重症患者和儿童属于弱势患者群体,因此对儿科重症医学(PCCM)专科住院医师进行临时委托是一项风险特别高的决策。本研究旨在通过教员对案例 vignettes 的评分来描述 PCCM 专科住院医师的临时委托决策是如何做出的。作者调查了病情严重程度、关系、培训水平和任务如何相互作用以影响临时委托决策。2020 年,一项包含 16 个因四个特征(病情严重程度、关系、培训水平和任务)而异的 vignettes 的调查被分发给美国儿科重症监护专科住院医师培训项目的教员。受访者为每个案例确定一个委托水平并提供人口统计学数据。委托评分被分为“高委托”与“低委托”(仅直接监督或观察)。作者使用逻辑回归来评估这四个特征对二分委托评分的个体和交互作用。来自 30 个机构的 178 名受访者完成了调查(机构回应率为 44%)。病情严重程度、关系和任务均对所选委托水平有显著影响,但它们之间没有交互作用。教员最常选择“直接监督”作为 vignettes 的委托水平,包括 24%描述处于培训最后一年的专科住院医师的 vignettes。教员将大多数 vignettes(61%)评为“低委托”。教员或机构人口统计学与所选委托水平之间没有关系。正如在儿科、内科和外科实习生的总结性委托中所发现的那样,PCCM 专科住院医师的临时委托评分通常处于或低于“直接监督”水平。这可能与实践操作机会减少、该专业中低信任倾向的文化以及/或者委托量表解释的差异有关。