Yatabe Yasushi
Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Histopathology. 2024 Jan;84(1):50-66. doi: 10.1111/his.15080. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
Currently, lung cancer is treated by the highest number of therapeutic options and the benefits are based on multiple large-scale sequencing studies, translational research and new drug development, which has promoted our understanding of the molecular pathology of lung cancer. According to the driver alterations, different characteristics have been revealed, such as differences in ethnic prevalence, median age and alteration patterns. Consequently, beyond traditional chemoradiotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy and treatment with immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) also became available major therapeutic options. Interestingly, clinical results suggest that the recently established therapies target distinct lung cancer proportions, particularly between the EGFR/ALK and PD-1/PD-L1-positive subsets, e.g. the kinase inhibitors target driver mutation-positive tumours, whereas driver mutation-negative tumours respond to ICI treatment. These therapeutic efficacy-related differences might be explained by the molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer. Addictive driver mutations promote tumour formation with powerful transformation performance, resulting in a low tumour mutation burden, reduced immune surveillance, and subsequent poor response to ICIs. In contrast, regular tobacco smoke exposure repeatedly injures the proximal airway epithelium, leading to accumulated genetic alterations. In the latter pathway, overgrowth due to alteration and immunological exclusion against neoantigens is initially balanced. However, tumours could be generated from certain clones that outcompete immunological exclusion and outgrow the others. Consequently, this cancer type responds to immune check-point treatment. These pathogenic differences are explained well by the two-compartment model, focusing upon the anatomical and functional composition of distinct cellular components between the terminal respiratory unit and the air-conducting system.
目前,肺癌的治疗方法选择最多,其疗效基于多项大规模测序研究、转化研究和新药研发,这些推动了我们对肺癌分子病理学的认识。根据驱动基因突变,已揭示出不同特征,如种族患病率、中位年龄和突变模式的差异。因此,除了传统的放化疗外,分子靶向治疗和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗也成为主要的治疗选择。有趣的是,临床结果表明,最近确立的治疗方法针对不同比例的肺癌,特别是在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)/间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)和程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)/程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)阳性亚组之间,例如激酶抑制剂针对驱动基因突变阳性肿瘤,而驱动基因突变阴性肿瘤对ICI治疗有反应。这些与治疗疗效相关的差异可能由肺癌的分子发病机制来解释。成瘾性驱动基因突变以强大的转化能力促进肿瘤形成,导致肿瘤突变负荷低、免疫监视减少,随后对ICI反应不佳。相比之下,经常接触烟草烟雾会反复损伤近端气道上皮,导致基因改变积累。在后一种途径中,由于改变引起的过度生长和对新抗原的免疫排斥最初是平衡的。然而,肿瘤可能由某些克隆产生,这些克隆胜过免疫排斥并超过其他克隆生长。因此,这种癌症类型对免疫检查点治疗有反应。两室模型很好地解释了这些发病机制差异,该模型关注终末呼吸单位和气道传导系统之间不同细胞成分的解剖和功能组成。