Department of Psychiatry, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology;The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Internal Medicine-Cardiovascular, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology; The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 8;13(11):e079050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079050.
This study aimed to explore the mediating role of resilience and resignation coping in the relationship between consultation empathy and depression in patients with COVID-19.
Cross-sectional study.
Participants were recruited from a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, Guangdong province.
A total of 215 patients were recruited for this study.
A total of 215 patients completed the Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. PROCESS 4.1 model 6 was used to analyse the moderated mediating effects.
Consultation empathy had a positive correlation with resilience (r=0.34, p<0.001), and a negative correlation with resignation (r=-0.288, p<0.001) and depression (r=-0.379, p<0.001). Resilience had a negative correlation with resignation (r=-0.463, p<0.001) and depression (r=-0.605, p<0.001). Resignation had a positive correlation (r=0.547, p<0.001) with depression. In the moderated mediating model, consultation empathy had significant indirect predictive effects on depression through resilience (95% CI -0.093 to -0.030) or resignation (95% CI -0.043 to -0.005). Consultation empathy had significant indirect predictive effects on depression through both resilience and resignation (95% CI -0.030 to -0.008).
Consultation empathy not only predicted depression directly, but also indirectly predicted depression through the chain mediating effects of resilience and resignation coping.
本研究旨在探讨咨询共情与 COVID-19 患者抑郁之间的关系中,韧性和应对方式的中介作用。
横断面研究。
参与者来自广东省广州市的一家三甲医院。
共招募了 215 名患者参加本研究。
共 215 名患者完成了咨询和关系共情量表、Connor-Davidson 韧性量表、医学应对方式问卷和医院焦虑抑郁量表。采用 PROCESS 4.1 模型 6 分析调节中介效应。
咨询共情与韧性呈正相关(r=0.34,p<0.001),与应对方式呈负相关(r=-0.288,p<0.001)和抑郁呈负相关(r=-0.379,p<0.001)。韧性与应对方式呈负相关(r=-0.463,p<0.001)和抑郁呈负相关(r=-0.605,p<0.001)。应对方式与抑郁呈正相关(r=0.547,p<0.001)。在调节中介模型中,咨询共情通过韧性(95% CI -0.093 至-0.030)或应对方式(95% CI -0.043 至-0.005)对抑郁有显著的间接预测作用。咨询共情通过韧性和应对方式对抑郁有显著的间接预测作用(95% CI -0.030 至-0.008)。
咨询共情不仅直接预测抑郁,还通过韧性和应对方式的链式中介作用间接预测抑郁。