Martin P, Ishikawa S
J Auton Nerv Syst. 1986 Dec;17(4):249-62. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(86)90091-3.
We have characterized the dynamic interaction of the simultaneous changes of vagal activity and heart period on atrial contractile force. Our hypothesis was that the linear sum of these two separate effects was not equal to the response of the unpaced heart when both effects were elicited simultaneously. We performed 3 experiments: we measured the beat-to-beat inotropic response to brief vagal stimuli when the heart was paced; this represented the pure vagal effect on contractile force. We measured the responses to identical stimuli when the heart was not paced; this represented the effect of the combined influences. Finally, we measured the contractile responses to the identical sequences of changing cardiac intervals that were recorded in part 2 above but in the absence of vagal activity; this represented the pure effect of changes in cardiac cycle length on contractile force. These experiments were done at 3 levels of vagal stimulus intensity. We first subtracted the responses of the paced from those of the unpaced heart. These derived differences represented the linear elimination of the pure vagal effect from the combined responses. We then compared these differences with the responses to changing cardiac intervals that were measured in the absence of vagal activity (part 3, above). These two sets of responses were not significantly different at the low level of stimulus intensity. For the mid level of stimulus intensity, they were significantly different for only the 3rd and 4th beats after the stimulus. For the high level of stimulus intensity, they were significantly different for each of the first through the 4th beats (only) after the stimulus. We conclude that the independent effects of vagal activity and changing heart period combine non-linearly to produce the resultant inotropic response when the intensity of brief vagal stimuli is increased, but we cannot draw this conclusion at the lower levels of stimulus intensity.
我们已对迷走神经活动与心动周期同时变化对心房收缩力的动态相互作用进行了表征。我们的假设是,当这两种单独效应同时引发时,它们的线性总和并不等同于未起搏心脏的反应。我们进行了3项实验:在心脏起搏时,测量对短暂迷走神经刺激的逐搏变力反应;这代表了迷走神经对收缩力的纯粹效应。在心脏未起搏时,测量对相同刺激的反应;这代表了综合影响的效应。最后,我们测量了对上述第2部分记录的相同心脏间期变化序列的收缩反应,但不存在迷走神经活动;这代表了心动周期长度变化对收缩力的纯粹效应。这些实验在3个迷走神经刺激强度水平下进行。我们首先从未起搏心脏的反应中减去起搏心脏的反应。这些得出的差异代表了从综合反应中线性消除纯粹的迷走神经效应。然后,我们将这些差异与在不存在迷走神经活动时(上述第3部分)测量的对心脏间期变化的反应进行比较。在低刺激强度水平下,这两组反应无显著差异。对于中等刺激强度水平,仅在刺激后的第3和第4搏有显著差异。对于高刺激强度水平,在刺激后的第1至第4搏(仅)每搏都有显著差异。我们得出结论,当短暂迷走神经刺激强度增加时,迷走神经活动和心动周期变化的独立效应以非线性方式组合产生最终的变力反应,但在较低刺激强度水平下我们无法得出此结论。