Nomeikaite Auguste, Gelezelyte Odeta, Berger Thomas, Andersson Gerhard, Kazlauskas Evaldas
Center for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Internet Interv. 2023 Oct 24;34:100686. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100686. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) interventions can be as effective as traditional face-to-face therapy for various mental health conditions. However, a significant challenge these online interventions face is the high rate of people who start but then stop using the program. This early discontinuation can be seen as incomplete treatment and can reduce the potential benefits for users. By exploring why people stop using ICBT programs, we can better understand how to address this problem. This study aimed to examine the experiences of healthcare workers who had stopped using a therapist-guided internet-delivered stress recovery program to gain deeper insights into usage attrition. We conducted semi-structured interviews with twelve participants who were female healthcare workers ranging in age from 24 to 68 years ( = 44.67, = 11.80). Telephone interviews were conducted and the data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Qualitative data analysis revealed that most participants had multiple reasons for discontinuing the program. They identified both barriers and facilitators to using the program, which could be categorized as either personal or program related. Personal aspects included life circumstances, personal characteristics, and psychological responses to the program. Program-related aspects encompassed technical factors, program content, and the level of support provided. The findings of this study can enhance our understanding of why people stop using guided internet-delivered programs. We discuss the practical and research implications, with the ultimate aim of improving the design and efficacy of internet interventions.
互联网提供的认知行为疗法(ICBT)干预对于各种心理健康状况的效果可能与传统面对面疗法一样好。然而,这些在线干预面临的一个重大挑战是开始使用该程序但随后又停止使用的人群比例很高。这种早期中断可被视为治疗不完整,并可能降低用户获得的潜在益处。通过探究人们停止使用ICBT程序的原因,我们可以更好地理解如何解决这个问题。本研究旨在调查已停止使用治疗师指导的互联网提供的压力恢复程序的医护人员的经历,以更深入地了解使用损耗情况。我们对12名参与者进行了半结构化访谈,这些参与者均为女性医护人员,年龄在24岁至68岁之间(平均年龄=44.67岁,标准差=11.80岁)。通过电话进行访谈,并使用主题分析法对数据进行转录和分析。定性数据分析表明,大多数参与者停止使用该程序有多种原因。他们确定了使用该程序的障碍和促进因素,这些因素可分为个人因素或与程序相关的因素。个人因素包括生活状况、个人特征以及对该程序的心理反应。与程序相关的因素包括技术因素、程序内容以及提供的支持水平。本研究的结果可以增进我们对人们停止使用指导式互联网提供程序原因的理解。我们讨论了实际意义和研究意义,最终目的是改进互联网干预措施的设计和效果。