Suppr超能文献

探索在肾脏模型中实现安全有效的铥纤维激光碎石术的最佳参数。

Exploring optimal settings for safe and effective thulium fibre laser lithotripsy in a kidney model.

机构信息

Thomas Lord Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2024 Feb;133(2):223-230. doi: 10.1111/bju.16218. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the optimal laser settings and treatment strategies for thulium fibre laser (TFL) lithotripsy, namely, those with the highest treatment efficiency, lowest thermal injury risk, and shortest procedure time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An in vitro kidney model was used to assess the efficacy of TFL lithotripsy in the upper calyx. Stone ablation experiments were performed on BegoStone phantoms at different combinations of pulse energy (E ) and frequency (F) to determine the optimal settings. Temperature changes and thermal injury risks were monitored using embedded thermocouples. Experiments were also performed on calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones to validate the optimal settings.

RESULTS

High E /low F settings demonstrated superior treatment efficiency compared to low E /high F settings using the same power. Specifically, 0.8 J/12 Hz was the optimal setting, resulting in a twofold increase in treatment efficiency, a 39% reduction in energy expenditure per unit of ablated stone mass, a 35% reduction in residual fragments, and a 36% reduction in total procedure time compared to the 0.2 J/50 Hz setting for COM stones. Thermal injury risk assessment indicated that 10 W power settings with high E /low F combinations remained below the threshold for tissue injury, while higher power settings (>10 W) consistently exceeded the safety threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that high E /low F settings, such as 0.8 J/12 Hz, are optimal for TFL lithotripsy in the treatment of COM stones. These settings demonstrated significantly improved treatment efficiency with reduced residual fragments compared to conventional settings while keeping the thermal dose below the injury threshold. This study highlights the importance of using the high E /low F combination with low power settings, which maximizes treatment efficiency and minimizes potential thermal injury. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal settings for TFL for treating kidney stones with different compositions.

摘要

目的

探索钬纤维激光(TFL)碎石术的最佳激光参数和治疗策略,即具有最高治疗效率、最低热损伤风险和最短治疗时间的参数和策略。

材料和方法

采用体外肾模型评估 TFL 在上盏结石中的碎石效果。在不同的脉冲能量(E)和频率(F)组合下对 BegoStone 结石模型进行碎石实验,以确定最佳参数。通过嵌入式热电偶监测温度变化和热损伤风险。还对一水合草酸钙(COM)结石进行了实验,以验证最佳参数。

结果

与相同功率的低 E/高 F 参数相比,高 E/低 F 参数显示出更高的治疗效率。具体来说,0.8 J/12 Hz 是最佳参数,与 0.2 J/50 Hz 参数相比,治疗效率提高了一倍,单位碎石质量的能量消耗降低了 39%,残余碎片减少了 35%,总治疗时间减少了 36%。COM 结石的热损伤风险评估表明,10 W 功率下高 E/低 F 参数组合仍低于组织损伤阈值,而更高的功率设置(>10 W)始终超过安全阈值。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,高 E/低 F 参数(如 0.8 J/12 Hz)是治疗 COM 结石的 TFL 碎石术的最佳参数。与传统参数相比,这些参数的残余碎片明显减少,同时治疗效率显著提高,且热剂量保持在损伤阈值以下。本研究强调了使用低功率设置的高 E/低 F 组合的重要性,这最大限度地提高了治疗效率并降低了潜在的热损伤风险。需要进一步的研究来确定 TFL 治疗不同成分肾结石的最佳参数。

相似文献

1
Exploring optimal settings for safe and effective thulium fibre laser lithotripsy in a kidney model.
BJU Int. 2024 Feb;133(2):223-230. doi: 10.1111/bju.16218. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Comparative Analyses and Ablation Efficiency of Thulium Fiber Laser by Stone Composition.
J Urol. 2024 Mar;211(3):445-454. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003833. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
In Pursuit of the Optimal Dusting Settings with the Thulium Fiber Laser: An Assessment.
J Endourol. 2023 Aug;37(8):914-920. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0168. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
9
Assessment of Holmium:YAG, Pulsed-Thulium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers for Urinary Stone Ablation. Study.
J Endourol. 2024 Nov;38(11):1209-1216. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0349. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of p-Tm:YAG, TFL and Ho:YAG's in vitro ablation rates on synthetic and human stones.
BJUI Compass. 2025 Aug 18;6(8):e70067. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70067. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Thulium versus holmium: Which is safer for the removal of entombed stents?
Indian J Urol. 2025 Jul-Sep;41(3):205-209. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_6_25. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
3
High-frequency in laser lithotripsy: do we truly know what it means?
World J Urol. 2025 May 8;43(1):287. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05650-0.
8
Revealing physical interactions of ultrasound waves with the body through photoelasticity imaging.
Opt Lasers Eng. 2024 Oct;181. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2024.108361. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
In Pursuit of the Optimal Dusting Settings with the Thulium Fiber Laser: An Assessment.
J Endourol. 2023 Aug;37(8):914-920. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0168. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
2
Plasma formation in holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy.
Lasers Surg Med. 2023 Jul;55(5):503-514. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23659. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
3
Development of an optically transparent kidney model for laser lithotripsy research.
BJU Int. 2023 Jul;132(1):36-39. doi: 10.1111/bju.16015. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Thulium fibre laser lithotripsy, the new standard?
BJU Int. 2023 Apr;131(4):377. doi: 10.1111/bju.15943. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
6
Which Is the Best Laser for Lithotripsy? Thulium Fiber Laser.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Aug 19;44:15-17. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.020. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Which Is the Best Laser for Lithotripsy? Holmium Laser.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Aug 19;44:27-29. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.017. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Characterization of Fluid Dynamics and Temperature Profiles During Ureteroscopy with Laser Activation in a Model Ureter.
J Endourol. 2022 Dec;36(12):1593-1598. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0275. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
10
Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.
Eur Urol. 2022 Jul;82(1):73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验