Li Yue, Guo Hong-Li, Hu Ya-Hui, Wang Jie, Zhang Yuan-Yuan, Huang Jian, Xu Jing, Chen Jing, Lu Xiao-Peng, Chen Feng
Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Feb;9(1):268-277. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12865. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of perampanel (PER) monotherapy (MT) or add-on therapy (AT) in Chinese children with epilepsy, as well as to evaluate the data from routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of PER for these pediatric patients.
This retrospective and observational study was carried out on children with epilepsy (n = 340) from 2020 to 2022 at the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Outcome measures were the responder rate (50% or greater seizure reduction), long-term efficacy, and tolerability (number and types of adverse events) in MT and AT groups. Concentrations of plasma PER obtained from these patients, if available, were analyzed too.
A total of 279 patients achieved at least 3 months of therapy, and 58.1% responded to PER therapy. 53 of the responders were seizure-free (32.7%). The retention rate dropped from 88.0% at 3 months to 40.6% at 12 months after treatment. Patients with MT achieved better seizure control than those with AT (P < 0.001). Intriguingly, PER exerted a very weak effect on patients who took more than 2 ASMs or were diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy. There were no significant differences in tolerability between the two groups. In addition, 179 patients were routinely monitored for PER, and the trough concentrations (C ) for these patients ranged from 30.0 to 992.0 ng/mL. However, no significant difference in C was observed between responders and nonresponders (333 ng/mL vs 325.5 ng/mL, P = 0.264).
This study provides effectiveness and safety data on Chinese children with epilepsy treated with PER either as MT or as AT. The efficacy of patients receiving MT was much better than cases administered with more than 2 ASMs or diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy. In addition, no association was found between the plasma PER concentration and efficacy or safety.
The study reports the effects of perampanel on seizures and adverse effects in Chinese patients with epilepsy younger than 18 years. Seizures decreased in 58.1% of patients (responders); in a third of these responders, seizures stopped. After treatment was started, 88% of patients were still on perampanel at 3 months and 40.6% at 12 months. People who were treated with perampanel only were more likely to respond than those who received perampanel and other antiseizure treatments, although perampanel was tolerated equally well in these groups. Plasma perampanel concentration did not predict seizure response or adverse effects.
评估吡仑帕奈(PER)单药治疗(MT)或添加治疗(AT)对中国癫痫患儿的有效性和安全性,并评估这些儿科患者吡仑帕奈常规治疗药物监测(TDM)的数据。
这项回顾性观察研究于2020年至2022年在南京医科大学附属儿童医院对癫痫患儿(n = 340)进行。观察指标为MT组和AT组的缓解率(癫痫发作减少50%或更多)、长期疗效和耐受性(不良事件的数量和类型)。若有这些患者的血浆PER浓度数据,也进行分析。
共有279例患者接受了至少3个月的治疗,58.1%的患者对PER治疗有反应。53例有反应的患者无癫痫发作(32.7%)。治疗后保留率从3个月时的88.0%降至12个月时的40.6%。MT组患者的癫痫控制情况优于AT组(P < 0.001)。有趣的是,PER对服用超过2种抗癫痫药物(ASM)或被诊断为难治性癫痫的患者效果非常微弱。两组之间的耐受性无显著差异。此外,对179例患者进行了PER常规监测,这些患者的谷浓度(C)范围为30.0至992.0 ng/mL。然而,有反应者和无反应者之间的C值无显著差异(333 ng/mL对325.5 ng/mL,P = 0.264)。
本研究提供了中国癫痫患儿接受PER单药治疗或添加治疗的有效性和安全性数据。接受MT治疗的患者疗效比服用超过2种ASM或被诊断为难治性癫痫的患者好得多。此外,未发现血浆PER浓度与疗效或安全性之间存在关联。
该研究报告了吡仑帕奈对18岁以下中国癫痫患者癫痫发作及不良反应的影响。58.1%的患者癫痫发作减少(有反应者);其中三分之一的有反应者癫痫发作停止。开始治疗后,3个月时88%的患者仍在服用吡仑帕奈,12个月时为40.6%。仅接受吡仑帕奈治疗的患者比接受吡仑帕奈及其他抗癫痫治疗的患者更易有反应,尽管两组对吡仑帕奈的耐受性相同。血浆吡仑帕奈浓度不能预测癫痫发作反应或不良反应。