Hunter Surgical Clinical Research Unit, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2023 Nov;24(9):818-822. doi: 10.1089/sur.2023.250. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
There remains debate as to the ideal skin preparation agent to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) after clean implant surgery. This study is a subgroup analysis of all patients undergoing implant surgery in the NEWSkin prep trial. The NEWSkin prep trial is a randomized clinical trial (RCT; n = 3300) comparing the three antiseptic skin preparation agents commonly used prior to incisional surgery: chlorhexidine with alcohol (C-Alc), povidone iodine with alcohol (PI-Alc), and aqueous povidone iodine (PI-Aq). All participants who underwent clean incisional surgeries with implants from this trial were selected for analysis. The primary outcome was SSI rate; secondary outcomes were complication rates and re-admission rates. A total of 712 patients in the NEWSkinPrep study underwent clean implant surgery between January 2015 and December 2018. Randomization resulted in the following distribution: C-Alc, 238; PI-Alc, 243; and PI-Aq, 231. Median age of participants was 63 years and 41% were female. Surgical site infection rates were: C-Alc, 10.13%; PI-Alc,11.52%; and PI-Aq, 11.26%. Povidone iodine with alcohol did not appear to be non-inferior to C-Alc (mean difference, 1.39%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.17 to 6.95) and PI-Alc was not superior to PI-Aq (mean difference, 0.27%; 95% CI, -5.45 to 5.99; p = 0.9271). There were no differences seen in secondary outcomes between groups. These results indicate a similarity between PI-Alc and C-Alc and that PI-Alc was not superior to PI-Aq. Because this study was not powered to assess these differences in clean cases with implants, additional studies are needed to assess these agents.
对于清洁植入手术后预防手术部位感染(SSI)的理想皮肤准备剂,仍存在争议。本研究是对所有接受植入手术的患者进行的 NEWSkin 预处理试验的亚组分析。NEWSkin 预处理试验是一项随机临床试验(RCT;n=3300),比较了三种常用的切口手术前抗菌皮肤准备剂:氯己定加酒精(C-Alc)、聚维酮碘加酒精(PI-Alc)和聚维酮碘水溶液(PI-Aq)。从这项试验中选择所有接受清洁切口手术和植入物的参与者进行分析。主要结局是 SSI 发生率;次要结局是并发症发生率和再入院率。NEWSkinPrep 研究中有 712 名患者在 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受了清洁植入手术。随机分组结果如下:C-Alc 组 238 例,PI-Alc 组 243 例,PI-Aq 组 231 例。参与者的中位年龄为 63 岁,41%为女性。手术部位感染率分别为:C-Alc 组 10.13%,PI-Alc 组 11.52%,PI-Aq 组 11.26%。聚维酮碘加酒精似乎并不优于 C-Alc(平均差异,1.39%;95%置信区间[CI],-4.17 至 6.95),PI-Alc 也不比 PI-Aq 优越(平均差异,0.27%;95%CI,-5.45 至 5.99;p=0.9271)。各组之间在次要结局方面没有差异。这些结果表明 PI-Alc 与 C-Alc 相似,PI-Alc 并不优于 PI-Aq。由于这项研究没有足够的能力评估这些在清洁植入病例中的差异,因此需要进行更多的研究来评估这些药物。