• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蛋白质组学鉴定用于诊断急性脑卒中患者的新型血液生物标志物。

Proteomics to Identify New Blood Biomarkers for Diagnosing Patients With Acute Stroke.

机构信息

Department of Neurology Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental Lisbon Portugal.

Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa (CCAL), NOVA Medical School (MNS) Lisbon Portugal.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Nov 21;12(22):e030021. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030021. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.123.030021
PMID:37947097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10727303/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood biomarkers are a potential tool for early stroke diagnosis. We aimed to perform a pilot and exploratory study on untargeted blood biomarkers in patients with suspected stroke by using mass spectrometry analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective observational study of consecutive patients with suspected stroke admitted within 6 hours of last being seen well. Blood samples were collected at admission. Patients were divided into 3 groups: ischemic stroke (IS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and stroke mimics. Quantitative analysis from mass spectrometry data was performed using a supervised approach. Biomarker-based prediction models were developed to differentiate IS from ICH and ICH+stroke mimics. Models were built aiming to minimize misidentification of patients with ICH as having IS. We included 90 patients, one-third within each subgroup. The median age was 71 years (interquartile range, 57-81 years), and 49 participants (54.4%) were women. In quantitative analysis, C3 (complement component 3), ICAM-2 (intercellular adhesion molecule 2), PLGLA (plasminogen like A), STXBP5 (syntaxin-binding protein 5), and IGHV3-64 (immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-64) were the 5 most significantly dysregulated proteins for both comparisons. Biomarker-based models showed 88% sensitivity and 89% negative predictive value for differentiating IS from ICH, and 75% sensitivity and 95% negative predictive value for differentiating IS from ICH+stroke mimics. ICAM-2, STXBP5, PLGLA, C3, and IGHV3-64 displayed the highest importance score in our models, being the most informative for identifying patients with stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

In this proof-of-concept and exploratory study, our biomarker-based prediction models, including ICAM-2, STXBP5, PLGLA, C3, and IGHV3-64, showed 75% to 88% sensitivity for identifying patients with IS, while aiming to minimize misclassification of ICH. Although our methodology provided an internal validation, these results still need validation in other cohorts and with different measurement techniques.

摘要

背景

血液生物标志物是早期中风诊断的一种潜在工具。我们旨在通过质谱分析对疑似中风患者进行非靶向性血液生物标志物的初步探索性研究。

方法

这是一项连续纳入发病后 6 小时内就诊的疑似中风患者的前瞻性观察性研究。入院时采集血样。患者分为 3 组:缺血性中风(IS)、颅内出血(ICH)和中风模拟组。采用有监督方法对质谱数据进行定量分析。建立基于生物标志物的预测模型以区分 IS 与 ICH 和 ICH+中风模拟组。模型的建立旨在尽量减少将 ICH 患者误诊为 IS。我们纳入了 90 例患者,每组各三分之一。中位年龄为 71 岁(四分位距 57-81 岁),49 名患者(54.4%)为女性。在定量分析中,C3(补体成分 3)、ICAM-2(细胞间黏附分子 2)、PLGLA(纤溶酶原样 A)、STXBP5(突触结合蛋白 5)和 IGHV3-64(免疫球蛋白重链可变区 3-64)是两种比较中差异最显著的 5 个失调蛋白。基于生物标志物的模型在区分 IS 与 ICH 时的灵敏度为 88%,阴性预测值为 89%,在区分 IS 与 ICH+中风模拟组时的灵敏度为 75%,阴性预测值为 95%。ICAM-2、STXBP5、PLGLA、C3 和 IGHV3-64 在我们的模型中显示出最高的重要性评分,是识别中风患者最有价值的信息。

结论

在这项概念验证和探索性研究中,我们的基于生物标志物的预测模型包括 ICAM-2、STXBP5、PLGLA、C3 和 IGHV3-64,在识别 IS 患者时具有 75%至 88%的灵敏度,同时尽量减少 ICH 的误诊。尽管我们的方法提供了内部验证,但这些结果仍需在其他队列和使用不同测量技术中进行验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/e2953f3f5f7d/JAH3-12-e030021-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/68e1ed858c35/JAH3-12-e030021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/f6553c4308b7/JAH3-12-e030021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/c29d6e4539d2/JAH3-12-e030021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/042df50da0d8/JAH3-12-e030021-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/e2953f3f5f7d/JAH3-12-e030021-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/68e1ed858c35/JAH3-12-e030021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/f6553c4308b7/JAH3-12-e030021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/c29d6e4539d2/JAH3-12-e030021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/042df50da0d8/JAH3-12-e030021-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26c/10727303/e2953f3f5f7d/JAH3-12-e030021-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Proteomics to Identify New Blood Biomarkers for Diagnosing Patients With Acute Stroke.蛋白质组学鉴定用于诊断急性脑卒中患者的新型血液生物标志物。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Nov 21;12(22):e030021. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030021. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
2
Subtyping strokes using blood-based protein biomarkers: A high-throughput proteomics and machine learning approach.使用血液中的蛋白质生物标志物对中风进行亚型分类:一种高通量蛋白质组学和机器学习方法。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Apr;55(4):e14372. doi: 10.1111/eci.14372. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin Carboxy-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 Serum Concentrations for Differentiating Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage from Ischemic Stroke.胶质纤维酸性蛋白和泛素羧基末端水解酶-L1 血清浓度对鉴别急性脑出血与缺血性脑卒中的诊断准确性。
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Aug;33(1):39-48. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-00931-5.
4
Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker for intracerebral haemorrhage in patients with acute stroke.血清胶质纤维酸性蛋白作为急性卒中患者脑出血的生物标志物。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;77(2):181-4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.074823. Epub 2005 Sep 20.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein for differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral ischemia in patients with symptoms of acute stroke.血浆神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白对急性脑卒中症状患者鉴别脑出血和脑缺血的诊断准确性。
Clin Chem. 2012 Jan;58(1):237-45. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.172676. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
6
Blood Biomarkers to Differentiate Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes.用于区分缺血性卒中和出血性卒中的血液生物标志物。
Neurology. 2021 Apr 13;96(15):e1928-e1939. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011742. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
7
Apolipoprotein A-I and Paraoxonase-1 Are Potential Blood Biomarkers for Ischemic Stroke Diagnosis.载脂蛋白A-I和对氧磷酶-1是缺血性中风诊断的潜在血液生物标志物。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jun;25(6):1360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.02.027. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
Role of Blood Biomarkers in Differentiating Ischemic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage.血液生物标志物在鉴别缺血性卒中和脑出血中的作用。
Neurol India. 2020 Jul-Aug;68(4):824-829. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.293467.
9
Proteomics-Based Approach to Identify Novel Blood Biomarker Candidates for Differentiating Intracerebral Hemorrhage From Ischemic Stroke-A Pilot Study.基于蛋白质组学的方法识别用于区分脑出血和缺血性中风的新型血液生物标志物候选物——一项初步研究
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 17;12:713124. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.713124. eCollection 2021.
10
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein for Prehospital Diagnosis of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.胶质纤维酸性蛋白用于脑出血的院前诊断
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(1-2):76-81. doi: 10.1159/000453460. Epub 2016 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Unravelling the genetic architecture of cerebral small vessel disease in the context of stroke.在中风背景下解析脑小血管病的遗传结构。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2025 Aug 6:271678X251362977. doi: 10.1177/0271678X251362977.
2
Advancing Ischemic Stroke Prognosis: Key Role of MiR-155 Non-Coding RNA.进展性缺血性中风的预后:微小RNA-155非编码RNA的关键作用
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 22;26(9):3947. doi: 10.3390/ijms26093947.
3
Towards Rapid and Low-Cost Stroke Detection Using SERS and Machine Learning.利用表面增强拉曼光谱和机器学习实现快速低成本的中风检测
Biosensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 22;15(3):136. doi: 10.3390/bios15030136.
4
The Association of Serum Biomarkers With Symptomatic Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Combined Retrospective and Prospective Study.急性缺血性中风患者血清生物标志物与症状性出血性转化的关联:一项回顾性与前瞻性相结合的研究
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025 Mar;31(3):e70321. doi: 10.1111/cns.70321.
5
Wireless radiation and health: making the case for proteomics research of individual sensitivity.无线辐射与健康:为个体敏感性的蛋白质组学研究提供依据。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 10;12:1543818. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1543818. eCollection 2024.