Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Jan;88:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.096. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
Reconstructive surgeons frequently face challenges with free tissue transfer when transplanted flaps are thicker than intended. This is especially pronounced in lower limb cases, where the soft tissue below the knee is thin. The supra-fascial superficial circumflex iliac perforator (SCIP) flap overcomes this problem, but venous congestion remains a concern. We aim to examine the venous anatomy of the SCIP flap through cadaveric dissections and clinical data analyses to enhance the understanding of the venous anatomy and reduce venous congestion in future procedures.
Eight cadaveric groins underwent venous dye injection and dissection to identify the superficial circumflex iliac vein (SCIV) and venae comitantes (VC) vascular networks. The venous anatomy was studied for dominant drainage. From April 2015 to December 2019, we conducted 102 SCIP flap reconstructions, mainly using the superficial circumflex iliac artery's superficial branch. Clinical data were analyzed and correlated with cadaveric dissections. SCIP flaps were categorized into three groups: dual drainage (VC and SCIV) in group I, SCIV-only in group II, and VC-only in group III.
Correlations between clinical cases and cadaveric dissections revealed the SCIV as an independent drainage system with oscillating links to the VC. The SCIV is approximately twice the diameter of the VC, and the area of each vascular network suggests codominance. No significant difference in flap loss or venous congestion rates was noted when SCIV was the sole drainage, compared with VC or dual drainage.
The SCIP flap with one artery and SCIV anastomosis, exhibits low venous congestion rates. Surgeons should consider SCIV for safe SCIP flap reconstruction.
当移植皮瓣比预期厚时,重建外科医生在进行游离组织移植时常会面临挑战。在膝关节以下的下肢病例中,这种情况更为明显,因为此处的膝关节以下的软组织较薄。股前外侧旋髂浅动脉穿支(SCIP)皮瓣克服了这个问题,但静脉淤血仍然是一个问题。我们旨在通过尸体解剖和临床数据分析来研究 SCIP 皮瓣的静脉解剖结构,以增强对静脉解剖结构的理解,减少未来手术中的静脉淤血。
8 具尸体腹股沟进行静脉染料注射和解剖,以确定旋髂浅静脉(SCIV)和伴行静脉(VC)血管网络。研究了主要静脉引流的静脉解剖结构。自 2015 年 4 月至 2019 年 12 月,我们进行了 102 例 SCIP 皮瓣重建,主要使用旋髂浅动脉的浅支。分析了临床数据并与尸体解剖相关联。SCIP 皮瓣分为三组:I 组为双重引流(VC 和 SCIV),II 组为 SCIV 单一引流,III 组为 VC 单一引流。
临床病例与尸体解剖的相关性研究表明,SCIV 是一个独立的引流系统,与 VC 之间存在波动连接。SCIV 的直径约为 VC 的两倍,每个血管网络的面积表明两者具有同等的支配地位。当 SCIV 为唯一引流时,与 VC 或双重引流相比,皮瓣丢失或静脉淤血发生率无显著差异。
带有一支动脉和 SCIV 吻合的 SCIP 皮瓣,其静脉淤血发生率较低。外科医生应考虑使用 SCIV 进行安全的 SCIP 皮瓣重建。