Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Oct;36:410-416. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
The Fascial Distortion Model (FDM) is a relatively new manual therapy approach in the field of musculoskeletal physical therapy, but to date no study has been conducted to compare its' effect in comparison with joint mobilization on patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
The present study aims to compare the efficacy of the FDM versus joint mobilization in pain intensity, pain-free abduction range of motion and function of patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
single-blind, parallel-arm randomized controlled trial.
26 patients diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome were equally randomized into 2 groups: manual treatment according to the FDM, and joint mobilization of the shoulder complex. All patients received 3 intervention sessions every other day. Pain intensity (by visual analogue scale), pain-free abduction range of motion (by goniometry) and function (by Persian version of shoulder pain and disability index) were measured before and after every session and at follow-up 2 weeks later. Patients' satisfaction with treatment was also measured (by a 4-point Likert scale) at follow-up.
FDM therapy group showed statistically significant greater pain reduction (P = 0.014) and range of motion increment (P = 0.044) than joint mobilization group after intervention, while only range of motion maintained the difference at follow-up (P = 0.034). Function improvement was not statistically different after the intervention (P = 0.582) and at follow-up (P = 0.094). There was no difference in patients' satisfaction with treatment between groups (P > 0.05).
The FDM is a safe and effective treatment approach with comparable results to joint mobilization in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
筋膜扭曲模型(FDM)是肌肉骨骼物理治疗领域中一种相对较新的手法治疗方法,但迄今为止,尚无研究比较其与关节松动术治疗肩峰下撞击综合征患者的效果。
本研究旨在比较 FDM 与关节松动术治疗肩峰下撞击综合征患者疼痛强度、无痛外展活动范围和功能的疗效。
单盲、平行臂随机对照试验。
将 26 例诊断为肩峰下撞击综合征的患者随机分为 2 组:根据 FDM 进行手法治疗和肩复合体关节松动术。所有患者每隔一天接受 3 次干预治疗。在每次治疗前后和 2 周后随访时测量疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分法)、无痛外展活动范围(测角法)和功能(波斯语版肩痛和残疾指数)。在随访时还通过 4 分 Likert 量表评估患者对治疗的满意度。
FDM 治疗组在干预后疼痛减轻(P=0.014)和活动范围增加(P=0.044)方面均显著优于关节松动组,而仅在随访时活动范围保持差异(P=0.034)。干预后和随访时功能改善均无统计学差异(P=0.582 和 P=0.094)。两组患者对治疗的满意度无差异(P>0.05)。
FDM 是一种安全有效的治疗方法,与肩峰下撞击综合征患者的关节松动术治疗效果相当。