School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;73(3):563-578. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01907-9. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
Wildlife across all land tenures is under threat from anthropogenic drivers including climate change, invasive species, and habitat loss. This study focuses on private lands, where effective management for wildlife conservation requires locally relevant knowledge about wildlife populations, habitat condition, threatening ecological processes, and social drivers of and barriers to conservation. Collaborative socio-ecological research can inform wildlife management by integrating the place-based ecological and social knowledge of private landholders with the theoretical and applied knowledge of researchers and practitioners, including that of Traditional Owners. In privately-owned landscapes, landholders are often overlooked as a source of local ecological knowledge grounded in learning through continuous embodied interaction with their environment and community. Here we report on WildTracker, a transdisciplinary socio-ecological research collaboration involving 160 landholders in Tasmania, Australia. This wildlife-focused citizen science project generated and integrated local socio-ecological knowledge in the research process. The project gathered quantitative and qualitative data on wildlife ecology, land management practices, and landholder learning via wildlife cameras, sound recorders, workshops, questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. Through this on-going collaboration, landholders, researchers, and conservation practitioners established relationships based on mutual learning, gathering and sharing knowledge, and insights about wildlife conservation. Our project documents how local ecological knowledge develops and changes through everyday processes of enquiry and interaction with other knowledge holders including researchers and conservation practitioners. Qualitative insights derived from the direct experience and citizen science practices of landholders were integrated with quantitative scientific assessments of wildlife populations and habitat condition to produce a novel model of collaborative conservation research.
受人类活动驱动,包括气候变化、入侵物种和栖息地丧失等因素的影响,所有土地拥有权下的野生动物都面临威胁。本研究重点关注私人土地,因为要对野生动物进行有效的管理以保护它们,就需要了解当地与野生动物种群、栖息地状况、威胁生态过程以及保护的社会驱动因素和障碍相关的知识。通过将私有土地所有者基于地方的生态和社会知识与研究人员和从业人员(包括传统所有者)的理论和应用知识相结合,合作性的社会生态研究可以为野生动物管理提供信息。在私有景观中,土地所有者常常被忽视,因为他们的环境和社区的持续互动学习所产生的本地生态知识是扎根于地方的。在这里,我们报告了一个涉及澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州 160 名土地所有者的跨学科社会生态研究合作项目——WildTracker。这个以野生动物为重点的公民科学项目在研究过程中生成和整合了当地的社会生态知识。该项目通过野生动物摄像机、录音器、研讨会、调查问卷和半结构化访谈收集了关于野生动物生态、土地管理实践和土地所有者学习的定量和定性数据。通过这种持续的合作,土地所有者、研究人员和保护从业人员建立了基于相互学习、知识收集和共享以及对野生动物保护的深入了解的关系。我们的项目记录了地方生态知识如何通过与包括研究人员和保护从业人员在内的其他知识持有者的日常探究和互动过程发展和变化。从土地所有者的直接经验和公民科学实践中得出的定性见解与对野生动物种群和栖息地状况的定量科学评估相结合,产生了一个合作保护研究的新模型。