Suppr超能文献

评估生育力保护干预措施是否符合 ASCO 指南,以支持接受癌症治疗的育龄期女性:系统评价。

Evaluating fertility preservation interventions for alignment with ASCO Guidelines for reproductive aged women undergoing cancer treatment: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2023 Nov 11;31(12):689. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08133-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

While cancer treatment advancements have increased the number of reproductive-aged women survivors, they can harm reproductive function. Despite national guidelines, oncofertility service uptake remains low. This review explores interventions for fertility preservation alignment with American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines and consideration of a multilevel framework.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed literature from 2006 to 2022 across four databases. Identified interventions were assessed and scored for quality based on CONSORT and TREND statement checklists. Results were synthesized to assess for intervention alignment with ASCO guidelines and four multilevel intervention framework characteristics: targeted levels of influence, conceptual clarity, methodologic pragmatism, and sustainability.

RESULTS

Of 407 articles identified, this review includes nine unique interventions. The average quality score was 7.7 out of 11. No intervention was guided by theory. Per ASCO guidelines, most (n=8) interventions included provider-led discussions of treatment-impaired fertility. Fewer noted discussions on fertility preservation approaches (n=5) and specified discussion timing (n=4). Most (n=8) referred patients to reproductive specialists, and few (n=2) included psychosocial service referrals. Most (n=8) were multilevel, with five targeting three levels of influence. Despite targeting multiple levels, all analyses were conducted at the individual level. Intervention strategies included: educational components (n=5), decision aids (n=2), and nurse navigators (n=2). Five interventions considered stakeholders' views. All interventions were implemented in real-world contexts, and only three discussed sustainability.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identifies key gaps in ASCO guideline-concordant fertility preservation that could be filled by updating and adhering to standardized clinical practice guidelines and considering multilevel implementation frameworks elements.

摘要

目的

尽管癌症治疗的进步增加了生殖年龄女性幸存者的数量,但它们可能会损害生殖功能。尽管有国家指南,但肿瘤生育力服务的利用率仍然很低。本综述探讨了与美国临床肿瘤学会 (ASCO) 指南一致的生育力保存干预措施,并考虑了一个多层次框架。

方法

我们系统地回顾了 2006 年至 2022 年四个数据库中的文献。根据 CONSORT 和 TREND 声明检查表评估和评分确定的干预措施的质量。综合结果以评估干预措施与 ASCO 指南的一致性以及四个多层次干预框架特征:目标影响水平、概念清晰度、方法务实性和可持续性。

结果

在 407 篇文章中,本综述包括 9 项独特的干预措施。平均质量评分为 11 分中的 7.7 分。没有一项干预措施是基于理论的。根据 ASCO 指南,大多数(n=8)干预措施包括治疗受损生育力的提供者主导讨论。较少的干预措施提到了生育力保存方法的讨论(n=5)和指定的讨论时间(n=4)。大多数(n=8)将患者转介给生殖专家,很少(n=2)包括心理社会服务转介。大多数(n=8)是多层次的,其中 5 个针对 3 个影响层次。尽管针对多个层次,但所有分析都是在个体水平上进行的。干预策略包括:教育组成部分(n=5)、决策辅助(n=2)和护士导航员(n=2)。有 5 项干预措施考虑了利益相关者的观点。所有干预措施均在真实环境中实施,只有 3 项讨论了可持续性。

结论

本综述确定了与 ASCO 指南一致的生育力保存方面的关键差距,这些差距可以通过更新和遵守标准化的临床实践指南以及考虑多层次实施框架要素来填补。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b65/10638151/0de3959cdc5c/520_2023_8133_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验