School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Jan;67(1):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01677-8. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
Cancer survivors are at increased risk for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation (CA) in this population remain limited. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes after CA for AF in patients with versus without prior or active cancer.
We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to April 2023 for studies comparing the safety and efficacy of CA for AF in cancer survivors. Outcomes of interest were bleeding events, late AF recurrence, and need for repeat ablation. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1. We pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for binary endpoints.
We included 5 retrospective cohort studies comprising 998 patients, of whom 41.4% had a history of cancer. Cancer survivors were at significantly higher risk of clinically relevant bleeding (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.17-4.0; p=0.01) as compared with those without cancer. The efficacy of CA for AF was similar between groups. Late AF recurrence at 12 months was not significantly different between patients with vs. without a history of cancer (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.78-2.13; p=0.32). Similar findings were observed in the outcome of repeat ablations (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.37-1.37; p=0.31).
These findings suggest that cancer survivors have an increased risk of bleeding after CA for AF relative to patients without cancer, with no significant difference in the efficacy of CA for maintenance of sinus rhythm between groups.
This systematic review is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42023394538.
癌症幸存者发生心房颤动(AF)的风险增加。然而,关于该人群中导管消融(CA)的疗效和安全性的数据仍然有限。因此,我们旨在进行系统评价和荟萃分析,比较有和无既往或活动性癌症的 AF 患者行 CA 后的结局。
我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 从建库至 2023 年 4 月发表的比较癌症幸存者中 CA 治疗 AF 的安全性和疗效的研究。感兴趣的结局是出血事件、晚期 AF 复发和需要再次消融。使用 Review Manager 5.4.1 进行统计学分析。我们对二分类结局采用比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)进行汇总。
我们纳入了 5 项回顾性队列研究,共 998 例患者,其中 41.4%有癌症病史。与无癌症的患者相比,癌症幸存者发生临床相关出血的风险显著更高(OR 2.17;95%CI 1.17-4.0;p=0.01)。两组间 CA 治疗 AF 的疗效相似。12 个月时的晚期 AF 复发无显著差异(OR 1.29;95%CI 0.78-2.13;p=0.32)。在重复消融的结局中也观察到类似的发现(OR 0.71;95%CI 0.37-1.37;p=0.31)。
这些发现表明,与无癌症的患者相比,癌症幸存者在行 CA 治疗 AF 后出血风险增加,但两组间 CA 维持窦律的疗效无显著差异。
本系统评价在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)中注册,注册号为 CRD42023394538。