Suppr超能文献

需要全髋关节置换术和腰椎脊柱融合术的患者髋关节功能预后评分较低:一项匹配的病例对照研究。

Patients Requiring Both Total Hip Arthroplasty and Lumbar Spinal Fusion Have Lower Hip Functional Outcome Scores: A Matched Case-Control Study.

机构信息

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Orthopaedics, LSU Health New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1291-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.004. Epub 2023 Nov 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While patients who undergo both lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) have increased complication rates compared to patients who have not undergone LSF, there is a paucity of literature evaluating THA functional outcomes in patients with a history of LSF. This study was conducted to determine whether patients undergoing THA with a history of LSF have inferior functional outcomes compared to patients having no history of LSF.

METHODS

A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted at an academic center. Patients who underwent both THA and LSF (cases) were matched with controls who underwent THA without LSF. Inclusion criteria required a minimum of 1-year follow-up for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement [HOOS-JR]. Following propensity matching for age, sex, race, body mass index, and comorbidities, 291 cases and 1,164 controls were included, with no demographic differences.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent both THA and LSF had a significantly lower preoperative HOOS-JR (47 versus 50; P < .001), postoperative HOOS-JR (77 versus 85; P < .001), a significant lower rate of achieving the patient acceptable symptom state (55 versus 67%; P < .001), with no significant difference in delta HOOS-JR (34 versus 34; P = .834). When comparing patients undergoing THA before LSF or LSF before THA, no differences existed for preoperative HOOS-JR (50 versus 47; P = .304), but patients undergoing THA before LSF had lower postoperative HOOS-JR scores (74 versus 81; P = .034), a lower-delta HOOS-JR (27 versus 35; P = .022), and a lower rate of reaching the HOOS-JR minimal clinically important difference (62 versus 76%; P = .031).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who have a history of LSF experience a similar improvement in hip function when undergoing THA compared to patients who do not have a history of LSF. However, due to lower preoperative function, they may have a lower postoperative functional outcome ceiling. Additionally, patients undergoing THA before LSF have worse hip functional outcomes than patients undergoing LSF before THA.

摘要

背景

与未行腰椎融合术(LSF)的患者相比,同时行腰椎融合术(LSF)和全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者并发症发生率增加,但目前评估 LSF 病史患者 THA 功能结局的文献较少。本研究旨在确定有 LSF 病史的患者行 THA 是否比无 LSF 病史的患者功能结局更差。

方法

本研究在一家学术中心进行了回顾性匹配病例对照研究。同时行 THA 和 LSF 的患者(病例组)与仅行 THA 无 LSF 病史的患者(对照组)进行匹配。纳入标准要求髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分膝关节置换术(HOOS-JR)的随访时间至少 1 年。在对年龄、性别、种族、体重指数和合并症进行倾向评分匹配后,纳入 291 例病例和 1164 例对照,两组无统计学差异。

结果

同时行 THA 和 LSF 的患者术前 HOOS-JR 显著较低(47 分比 50 分;P<0.001),术后 HOOS-JR 显著较低(77 分比 85 分;P<0.001),达到患者可接受的症状状态的比例显著较低(55%比 67%;P<0.001),但 delta HOOS-JR 无显著差异(34 分比 34 分;P=0.834)。比较 THA 前先行 LSF 或 LSF 前先行 THA 的患者,术前 HOOS-JR 无显著差异(50 分比 47 分;P=0.304),但 THA 前先行 LSF 的患者术后 HOOS-JR 评分较低(74 分比 81 分;P=0.034),delta HOOS-JR 较低(27 分比 35 分;P=0.022),达到 HOOS-JR 最小临床重要差异的比例较低(62%比 76%;P=0.031)。

结论

与无 LSF 病史的患者相比,有 LSF 病史的患者在接受 THA 时髋关节功能也有相似的改善,但由于术前功能较差,术后功能结局的天花板可能较低。此外,先行 THA 后行 LSF 的患者髋关节功能结局比先行 LSF 后行 THA 的患者差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验