Vitagliano Amerigo, Cicinelli Ettore, Viganò Paola, Sorgente Giuseppe, Nicolì Pierpaolo, Busnelli Andrea, Dellino Miriam, Damiani Gianluca Raffaello, Gerli Sandro, Favilli Alessandro
1(st) Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Infertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Fertil Steril. 2024 Feb;121(2):299-313. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.11.007. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
Previous reviews have shown that a history of cesarean section (CS) is associated with a worse in vitro fertilization (IVF) prognosis. To date, whether the decline in the IVF chances of success should be attributed to the CS procedure itself or to the presence of isthmocele remains to be clarified.
To summarize the available evidence regarding the impact of isthmocele on IVF outcomes.
Electronic databases and clinical registers were searched until May 30, 2023.
Observational studies were included if they assessed the effect of isthmocele on IVF outcomes. Comparators were women with isthmocele and women without isthmocele with a previous CS or vaginal delivery. Study quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). The effect measures were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and unadjusted odds ratios (uORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The body of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group methodology.
Eight studies (n = 10,873 patients) were included in the analysis. Women with isthmocele showed a lower LBR than both women with a previous CS without isthmocele (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53-0.72) and those with a history of vaginal delivery (aOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42-0.71). The LBRs in women with a previous CS without isthmocele and those with a history of vaginal delivery were similar (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.47-1.15). Subgroup analysis suggested a negative effect of the intracavitary fluid (ICF) in women with isthmocele on the LBR (uOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.75), whereas the LBRs in women without ICF and those without isthmocele were similar (uOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61-1.45).
We found moderate quality of evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation grade 3/4) supporting a negative impact of isthmocele, but not of CS per se, on the LBR in women undergoing IVF. The adverse effect of isthmocele on IVF outcomes appears to be worsened by ICF accumulation before embryo transfer.
CRD42023418266.
既往综述表明,剖宫产史与体外受精(IVF)预后较差相关。迄今为止,IVF成功几率的下降应归因于剖宫产手术本身还是峡部憩室的存在仍有待阐明。
总结关于峡部憩室对IVF结局影响的现有证据。
检索电子数据库和临床登记资料直至2023年5月30日。
纳入评估峡部憩室对IVF结局影响的观察性研究。比较对象为有峡部憩室的女性以及既往有剖宫产或阴道分娩史但无峡部憩室的女性。使用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。
主要结局为活产率(LBR)。效应指标以调整优势比(aORs)和未调整优势比(uORs)及95%置信区间(95% CIs)表示。采用推荐分级评估、制定与评价工作组方法评估证据体。
八项研究(n = 10873例患者)纳入分析。有峡部憩室的女性活产率低于既往有剖宫产但无峡部憩室的女性(aOR,0.62;95% CI,0.53 - 0.72)以及有阴道分娩史的女性(aOR,0.55;95% CI,0.42 - 0.71)。既往有剖宫产但无峡部憩室的女性与有阴道分娩史的女性活产率相似(aOR,0.74;95% CI,0.47 - 1.15)。亚组分析表明,有峡部憩室女性的腔内积液(ICF)对活产率有负面影响(uOR,0.36;95% CI,0.18 - 0.75),而无ICF且无峡部憩室的女性活产率相似(uOR,0.94;95% CI,0.61 - 1.45)。
我们发现中等质量的证据(推荐分级评估、制定与评价等级3/4)支持峡部憩室而非剖宫产本身对接受IVF的女性活产率有负面影响。峡部憩室对IVF结局的不利影响在胚胎移植前因ICF积聚而似乎加剧。
CRD42023418266。