Suppr超能文献

解析编码和非编码 SCN1A 基因突变对 RNA 剪接的影响。

Deciphering the impact of coding and non-coding SCN1A gene variants on RNA splicing.

机构信息

Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Moscow 115478, Russia.

Genomed Ltd., Research Department, Moscow 107014, Russia.

出版信息

Brain. 2024 Apr 4;147(4):1278-1293. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad383.

Abstract

Variants that disrupt normal pre-mRNA splicing are increasingly being recognized as a major cause of monogenic disorders. The SCN1A gene, a key epilepsy gene that is linked to various epilepsy phenotypes, is no exception. Approximately 10% of all reported variants in the SCN1A gene are designated as splicing variants, with many located outside of the canonical donor and acceptor splice sites, and most have not been functionally investigated. However, given its restricted expression pattern, functional analysis of splicing variants in the SCN1A gene could not be routinely performed. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of all reported SCN1A variants and their potential to impact SCN1A splicing and conclude that splicing variants are substantially misannotated and under-represented. We created a splicing reporter system consisting of 18 splicing vectors covering all 26 protein-coding exons with different genomic contexts and several promoters of varying strengths in order to reproduce the wild-type splicing pattern of the SCN1A gene, revealing cis-regulatory elements essential for proper recognition of SCN1A exons. Functional analysis of 95 SCN1A variants was carried out, including all 68 intronic variants reported in the literature, located outside of the splice sites canonical dinucleotides; 21 exonic variants of different classes (synonymous, missense, nonsense and in-frame deletion) and six variants observed in patients with epilepsy. Interestingly, almost 20% of tested intronic variants had no influence on SCN1A splicing, despite being reported as causative in the literature. Moreover, we confirmed that the majority of predicted exonic variants affect splicing unravelling their true molecular mechanism. We used functional data to perform genotype-phenotype correlation, revealing distinct distribution patterns for missense and splice-affecting 'missense' variants and observed no difference in the phenotype severity of variants leading to in-frame and out-of-frame isoforms, indicating that the Nav1.1 protein is highly intolerant to structural variations. Our work demonstrates the importance of functional analysis in proper variant annotation and provides a tool for high-throughput delineation of splice-affecting variants in SCN1A in a whole-gene manner.

摘要

越来越多的研究表明,破坏正常前体 mRNA 剪接的变异是单基因疾病的主要原因之一。SCN1A 基因是一种关键的癫痫基因,与各种癫痫表型有关,也不例外。在 SCN1A 基因中,约有 10%的已报道变异被指定为剪接变异,其中许多位于典型供体和受体剪接位点之外,且大多数尚未进行功能研究。然而,由于其受限的表达模式,无法常规进行 SCN1A 基因剪接变异的功能分析。在这项研究中,我们对所有已报道的 SCN1A 变异及其对 SCN1A 剪接的潜在影响进行了全面分析,并得出结论,剪接变异被严重错误注释且代表性不足。我们构建了一个剪接报告系统,由 18 个剪接载体组成,涵盖了所有 26 个具有不同基因组背景的编码蛋白外显子,以及不同强度的几个启动子,以重现 SCN1A 基因的野生型剪接模式,揭示了对 SCN1A 外显子正确识别至关重要的顺式调控元件。对 95 种 SCN1A 变异进行了功能分析,包括文献中报道的所有位于剪接位点典型二核苷酸之外的 68 种内含子变异;21 种不同类型(同义、错义、无义和框内缺失)的外显子变异和 6 种在癫痫患者中观察到的变异。有趣的是,尽管在文献中被报道为致病原因,但近 20%的测试内含子变异对 SCN1A 剪接没有影响。此外,我们证实大多数预测的外显子变异会影响剪接,揭示了其真正的分子机制。我们利用功能数据进行基因型-表型相关性分析,发现错义变异和影响剪接的“错义”变异的分布模式明显不同,并且导致框内和框外异构体的变异在表型严重程度上没有差异,表明 Nav1.1 蛋白对结构变异高度耐受。我们的工作证明了在正确的变异注释中进行功能分析的重要性,并提供了一种高通量的工具,用于全面描绘 SCN1A 中的剪接变异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验