Division of General Pediatrics (JP Guevara, BP Jenssen, and M Luethke), Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (JP Guevara, BP Jenssen, and A Buttenheim), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics (JP Guevara), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Department of Pediatrics (ME Jimenez), Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Aug;24(6):900-904. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.11.010. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
To determine feasibility, acceptability, and explore outcomes of behavioral economic (BE) strategies to increase parent-child shared reading within a Reach Out and Read program.
We conducted rapid-cycle interviews with 10 parents to assess text messages followed by an 8-week randomized controlled trial of 3 BE strategies at 2 urban primary care practices: daily text messages (texting); daily text messages and regret messaging (regret); or daily text messages, regret messaging, and lottery participation (lottery). Parent-child dyads were eligible if children were <24 months old, Medicaid-eligible, and had access to phones capable of receiving and sending text messages. Parents completed the Read Subscale of the StimQ and Parenting Stress Index-short form (PSI-SF) pre- and postintervention, MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory (CDI), Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA), and a satisfaction measure postintervention. Differences between groups were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis.
Of 45 dyads randomized, 41 (91%) completed the study. Most participants were Black with incomes <$55,000. Parents reported reading on average 4 d/wk with no change in the reading frequency over time. StimQ scores increased over time, but there were no significant differences in StimQ, PSI-SF, CDI, and DECA scores between groups. Parents in all 3 groups reported satisfaction (3.8/5.0) with the intervention.
Implementation of BE strategies in 2 Reach Out and Read programs was feasible, near acceptable, and improved home reading environment scores. Future study should investigate BE strategies vis-à-vis usual care and be of sufficient duration and intensity to engage participants to assess its impact on patient and parent outcomes.
确定在“伸出援手并阅读”(Reach Out and Read)计划中采用行为经济学(BE)策略增加亲子共享阅读的可行性、可接受性,并探讨其结果。
我们对 10 位家长进行了快速循环访谈,以评估短信,然后在 2 家城市初级保健诊所进行了为期 8 周的 3 种 BE 策略的随机对照试验:每日短信(短信);每日短信和后悔短信(后悔);或每日短信、后悔短信和彩票参与(彩票)。如果孩子年龄<24 个月、符合医疗补助资格且有能接收和发送短信的手机,则符合亲子对的条件。父母在干预前后完成了 StimQ 的阅读量表和父母压力指数简表(PSI-SF)、麦克阿瑟沟通发展量表(CDI)、德雷克斯早期儿童评估(DECA)以及干预后的满意度量表。使用意向治疗分析评估组间差异。
在随机分配的 45 对亲子中,有 41 对(91%)完成了研究。大多数参与者是收入<$55,000 的黑人。父母报告平均每周阅读 4 天,但阅读频率在整个时间内没有变化。StimQ 分数随时间增加,但 StimQ、PSI-SF、CDI 和 DECA 分数在组间没有显著差异。所有 3 组的父母都报告对干预措施感到满意(3.8/5.0)。
在 2 个“伸出援手并阅读”计划中实施 BE 策略是可行的、接近可接受的,并改善了家庭阅读环境的分数。未来的研究应该调查 BE 策略与常规护理的关系,并具有足够的持续时间和强度,以吸引参与者,评估其对患者和家长结果的影响。