Borrelli Belinda, Endrighi Romano, Heeren Timothy, Adams William G, Gansky Stuart A, Werntz Scott, Rueras Nicolle, Stephens Danielle, Ameli Niloufar, Henshaw Michelle M
Center for Behavioral Science Research, Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2452780. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52780.
Caries is the most common chronic childhood disease, with substantial health disparities.
To test whether parent-targeted oral health text (OHT) messages outperform child wellness text (CWT) messages on pediatric caries increment and oral health behaviors among underserved children attending pediatric well-child visits.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The parallel randomized clinical trial, Interactive Parent-Targeted Text Messaging in Pediatric Clinics to Reduce Caries Among Urban Children (iSmile), included participants who were recruited during pediatric medical clinic visits at 4 sites in Boston, Massachusetts, that serve low-income and racially and ethnically diverse (herein, underserved) populations. English-speaking or Spanish-speaking caregivers of children younger than 7 years with at least 1 tooth were eligible. The study, which had a dose-matched design, was conducted from March 9, 2018, to February 28, 2022, with a 24-month follow-up. Text messages were sent for 4 months, plus a 1-month booster at 12 months.
Text messages were bilingual, automated, interactive, customized, and gamified. OHT messages focused on child toothbrushing and preventive dental visits. CWT messages focused on reading and child safety. Both included a choice of other content topics pertinent to their randomized arm.
The primary outcome was 24-month caries increment assessed by calibrated examiners. Secondary outcomes were oral health behaviors known to predict pediatric caries (eg, toothbrushing, sugar-sweetened beverages, diet, fluoride toothpaste use, and preventive dental visits), which were assessed by self-report, and participant satisfaction with the text message program. Caries examinations occurred at baseline and 12 and 24 months later. Self-report surveys occurred at these time points and at the end of the text message program (4 months).
Among 1388 caregivers who were approached for eligibility, 969 were eligible. Of these, 754 caregivers (mean [SD] age, 32.9 [7.2] years; 713 female [94.6%]) and 754 children (mean [SD] age, 2.9 [1.7] years; 377 female [50.0%]) were randomized (77.8%); 449 of 657 participants (68.3%) were below the poverty line. Responses to text messages were high (OHT group: 67.9%; CWT group: 69.6%). There were no significant group differences in caries increment (OHT group: 43.0% vs CWT group: 42.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.63-1.56]). Children in the OHT messaging group were significantly more likely to meet toothbrushing guidelines (odds ratio [OR], 1.77 [95% CI, 1.13-2.78]), have preventive dental visits (pooled OR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.18-1.94]), and use fluoride toothpaste (pooled OR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.06-2.01]) compared with those in the CWT messaging group over 24 months. OHT messages had a significant effect on caregivers' own toothbrushing (pooled mean difference, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.03-0.92]).
The findings of this randomized clinical trial including underserved children and their caregivers suggest that OHT messages had significant and sustained effects on preventive dental behaviors known to reduce caries among both caregivers and children, but had no effect on caries increment in children. Highly appealing and low-burden text messages coupled with evidence of change in oral health behaviors may be important in reducing oral health disparities.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03294590.
龋齿是儿童最常见的慢性疾病,存在显著的健康差异。
在参加儿童健康检查的服务不足儿童中,测试针对家长的口腔健康文本(OHT)信息在儿童龋齿增量和口腔健康行为方面是否优于儿童健康文本(CWT)信息。
设计、设置和参与者:平行随机临床试验“儿科诊所中针对家长的互动式文本信息传递以减少城市儿童龋齿(iSmile)”纳入了在马萨诸塞州波士顿4个为低收入、种族和民族多样化(以下简称服务不足)人群服务的儿科医疗诊所就诊期间招募的参与者。7岁以下至少有1颗牙齿的儿童的英语或西班牙语 caregiver 符合条件。该研究采用剂量匹配设计,于2018年3月9日至2022年2月28日进行,随访24个月。文本信息发送4个月,外加12个月时的1个月强化信息。
文本信息是双语的、自动的、交互式的、定制的和游戏化的。OHT信息侧重于儿童刷牙和预防性牙科就诊。CWT信息侧重于阅读和儿童安全。两者都包括与其随机分组相关的其他内容主题选择。
主要结局是由经过校准的检查人员评估的24个月龋齿增量。次要结局是已知可预测儿童龋齿的口腔健康行为(如刷牙、含糖饮料、饮食、含氟牙膏使用和预防性牙科就诊),通过自我报告进行评估,以及参与者对文本信息计划的满意度。龋齿检查在基线、12个月和24个月后进行。自我报告调查在这些时间点以及文本信息计划结束时(4个月)进行。
在1388名被评估是否符合条件的caregiver中,969名符合条件。其中,754名caregiver(平均[标准差]年龄,32.9[7.2]岁;713名女性[94.6%])和754名儿童(平均[标准差]年龄,2.9[1.7]岁;377名女性[50.0%])被随机分组(77.8%);657名参与者中有449名(68.3%)低于贫困线。对文本信息的回复率很高(OHT组:67.9%;CWT组:69.6%)。龋齿增量方面无显著组间差异(OHT组:43.0%对CWT组:42.7%;调整后的优势比,0.99[95%置信区间,0.63 - 1.56])。在24个月内,与CWT信息组的儿童相比,OHT信息组的儿童更有可能符合刷牙指南(优势比[OR],1.77[95%置信区间,1.13 - 2.78]),进行预防性牙科就诊(合并OR,1.51[95%置信区间,1.18 - 1.94]),以及使用含氟牙膏(合并OR,1.46[95%置信区间,1.06 - 2.01])。OHT信息对caregiver自身刷牙有显著影响(合并平均差异,0.48[95%置信区间,0.03 - 0.92])。
这项包括服务不足儿童及其caregiver的随机临床试验结果表明,OHT信息对已知可减少caregiver和儿童龋齿的预防性牙科行为有显著且持续的影响,但对儿童龋齿增量没有影响。极具吸引力且负担小的文本信息以及口腔健康行为改变的证据可能对减少口腔健康差异很重要。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03294590。