Kranzler Henry, Davis Christal, Feinn Richard, Jinwala Zeal, Khan Yousef, Oikonomou Ariadni, Silva-Lopez Damaris, Burton Isabel, Dixon Morgan, Milone Jackson, Ramirez Sarah, Shifman Naomi, Levey Daniel, Gelernter Joel, Hartwell Emily, Kember Rachel
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.
Quinnipiac University.
Res Sq. 2023 Oct 27:rs.3.rs-3483320. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3483320/v1.
Adverse childhood events (ACEs) contribute to the development of mood and anxiety disorders and substance dependence. However, the extent to which these effects are direct or indirect and whether genetic risk moderates them is unclear.
We examined associations among ACEs, mood/anxiety disorders, and substance dependence in 12,668 individuals (44.9% female, 42.5% African American/Black, 42.1% European American/White). We generated latent variables for each phenotype and modeled direct and indirect effects of ACEs on substance dependence, mediated by mood/anxiety disorders (forward or "self-medication" model) and of ACEs on mood/anxiety disorders, mediated by substance dependence (reverse or "substance-induced" model). In a sub-sample, we also generated polygenic scores for substance dependence and mood/anxiety disorder factors, which we tested as moderators in the mediation models.
Although there were significant indirect effects in both directions, mediation by mood/anxiety disorders (forward model) was greater than by substance dependence (reverse model). Greater genetic risk for substance dependence was associated with a weaker direct effect of ACEs on substance dependence in both the African- and European-ancestry groups (i.e., gene-environment interaction) and a weaker indirect effect in European-ancestry individuals (i.e., moderated mediation).
We found greater evidence that substance dependence results from self-medication of mood/anxiety disorders than that mood/anxiety disorders are substance induced. Among individuals at higher genetic risk for substance dependence who are more likely to develop a dependence diagnosis, ACEs exert less of an effect in promoting that outcome. Following exposure to ACEs, multiple pathways lead to mood/anxiety disorders and substance dependence. Specification of these pathways could inform individually targeted prevention and treatment approaches.
童年不良经历(ACEs)会导致情绪和焦虑障碍以及物质依赖的发生。然而,这些影响是直接的还是间接的,以及遗传风险是否会对其产生调节作用尚不清楚。
我们在12668名个体(44.9%为女性,42.5%为非裔美国人/黑人,42.1%为欧裔美国人/白人)中研究了ACEs、情绪/焦虑障碍和物质依赖之间的关联。我们为每种表型生成了潜在变量,并建立了ACEs对物质依赖的直接和间接影响模型,其中情绪/焦虑障碍作为中介(正向或“自我用药”模型),以及ACEs对情绪/焦虑障碍的直接和间接影响模型,其中物质依赖作为中介(反向或“物质诱导”模型)。在一个子样本中,我们还为物质依赖和情绪/焦虑障碍因素生成了多基因分数,并在中介模型中作为调节因素进行了测试。
尽管在两个方向上都存在显著的间接影响,但情绪/焦虑障碍作为中介(正向模型)的影响大于物质依赖作为中介(反向模型)。在非裔和欧裔群体中,物质依赖的遗传风险越高,ACEs对物质依赖的直接影响就越弱(即基因-环境相互作用),在欧裔个体中,间接影响也越弱(即调节中介)。
我们发现,有更多证据表明物质依赖是由情绪/焦虑障碍的自我用药导致的,而不是情绪/焦虑障碍是由物质诱导的。在物质依赖遗传风险较高且更有可能被诊断为依赖的个体中,ACEs在促进这一结果方面的作用较小。暴露于ACEs后,多种途径会导致情绪/焦虑障碍和物质依赖。明确这些途径可为个体化的预防和治疗方法提供依据。