Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Hospital in the Home (HITH), University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Mar;94(3):397-403. doi: 10.1111/ans.18768. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
Colonic diverticular disease is common and its incidence increases with age, with uncomplicated diverticulitis being the most common acute presentation (1). This typically results in inpatient admission, placing a significant burden on healthcare services (2). We aimed to determine the safety and effectiveness of using intravenous or oral antibiotics in the treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis on 30-day unplanned admissions, c-reactive protein (CRP), White Cell Count (WCC), pain resolution, cessation of pain medication, return to normal nutrition, and return to normal bowel function.
This single centre, 2-arm, parallel, 1:1, unblinded non-inferiority randomized controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of oral antibiotics versus intravenous antibiotics in the outpatient treatment of uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis. Inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years of age with CT proven acute uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis (Modified Hinchey Classification Stage 0-1a). Patients were randomly allocated receive either intravenous or oral antibiotics, both groups being treated in the outpatient setting with a Hospital in the Home (HITH) service. The primary outcome was the 30-day unplanned admission rate, secondary outcomes were biochemical markers, time to pain resolution, time to cessation of pain medication, time to return to normal function and time to return to normal bowel function.
In total 118 patients who presented with uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis were recruited into the trial. Fifty-eight participants were treated with IV antibiotics, and 60 were given oral antibiotics. We found there was no significant difference between groups with regards to 30-day unplanned admissions or inflammatory markers. There was also no significant difference with regards to time to pain resolution, cessation of pain medication use, return to normal nutrition, or return to normal bowel function.
Outpatient management of uncomplicated diverticulitis with oral antibiotics proved equally as safe and efficacious as intravenous antibiotic treatment in this randomized non-inferiority control trial.
结肠憩室病很常见,其发病率随着年龄的增长而增加,无并发症的憩室炎是最常见的急性表现(1)。这通常导致住院治疗,给医疗保健服务带来了巨大负担(2)。我们旨在确定静脉或口服抗生素治疗无并发症憩室炎在 30 天内非计划入院、C 反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞计数(WCC)、疼痛缓解、停止使用止痛药、恢复正常营养和恢复正常肠道功能方面的安全性和有效性。
这是一项单中心、2 臂、平行、1:1、非盲非劣效性随机对照试验,比较了口服抗生素与静脉抗生素在门诊治疗无并发症结肠憩室炎中的安全性和疗效。纳入标准为年龄大于 18 岁、CT 证实的急性无并发症结肠憩室炎(改良 Hinchey 分类 0-1a 期)的患者。患者随机分配接受静脉或口服抗生素治疗,两组均在家庭医院(HITH)服务的门诊治疗。主要结局是 30 天内非计划性入院率,次要结局是生化标志物、疼痛缓解时间、停止使用止痛药时间、恢复正常功能时间和恢复正常肠道功能时间。
共有 118 名患有单纯性结肠憩室炎的患者参加了该试验。58 名参与者接受静脉抗生素治疗,60 名接受口服抗生素治疗。我们发现两组在 30 天内非计划性入院率或炎症标志物方面没有显著差异。在疼痛缓解时间、停止使用止痛药时间、恢复正常营养时间或恢复正常肠道功能时间方面也没有显著差异。
在这项随机非劣效性对照试验中,口服抗生素治疗单纯性憩室炎的门诊管理与静脉抗生素治疗同样安全有效。