Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiological Science, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonjuro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06273, Republic of Korea.
Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun;34(6):4077-4088. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10390-z. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
This study aimed to determine the feasibility and limitations of deep learning-based coronary calcium scoring using positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in comparison with coronary calcium scoring using ECG-gated non-contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CaCT).
A total of 215 individuals who underwent both CaCT and PET-CT were enrolled in this retrospective study. The Agatston method was used to calculate the coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) from CaCT, PET-CT(reader), and PET-CT(AI) to analyse the effect of using different modalities and AI-based software on CACS measurement. The total CACS and CACS classified according to the CAC-DRS guidelines were compared between the three sets of CACS. The differences, correlation coefficients, intraclass coefficients (ICC), and concordance rates were analysed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
The correlation coefficient of the total CACS from CaCT and PET-CT(reader) was 0.837, PET-CT(reader) and PET-CT(AI) was 0.894, and CaCT and PET-CT(AI) was 0.768. The ICC of CACS from CaCT and PET-CT(reader) was 0.911, PET-CT(reader) and PET-CT(AI) was 0.958, and CaCT and PET-CT(AI) was 0.842. The concordance rate between CaCT and PET-CT(AI) was 73.8%, with a false-negative rate of 37.3% and a false-positive rate of 4.4%. Age and male sex were associated with an increased misclassification rate.
Artificial intelligence-assisted CACS measurements in PET-CT showed comparable results to CACS in coronary calcium CT. However, the relatively high false-negative results and tendency to underestimate should be of concern.
Application of automated calcium scoring to PET-CT studies could potentially select patients at high risk of coronary artery disease from among cancer patients known to be susceptible to coronary artery disease and undergoing routine PET-CT scans.
• Cancer patients are susceptible to coronary disease, and PET-CT could be potentially used to calculate coronary artery calcium score (CACS). • Calcium scoring using artificial intelligence in PET-CT automatically provides CACS with high ICC to CACS in coronary calcium CT. • However, underestimation and false negatives of CACS calculation in PET-CT should be considered.
本研究旨在比较基于深度学习的正电子发射断层扫描计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)与心电图门控非增强心脏计算机断层扫描(CaCT)的冠状动脉钙评分,以确定其可行性和局限性。
本回顾性研究共纳入 215 例同时接受 CaCT 和 PET-CT 检查的患者。采用 Agatston 法从 CaCT、PET-CT(reader)和 PET-CT(AI)计算冠状动脉钙评分(CACS),以分析不同模式和基于人工智能软件对 CACS 测量的影响。比较三组 CACS 之间总 CACS 和根据 CAC-DRS 指南分类的 CACS。分析差异、相关系数、组内相关系数(ICC)和一致性率。统计学显著性设为 p < 0.05。
CaCT 与 PET-CT(reader)的总 CACS 相关系数为 0.837,PET-CT(reader)与 PET-CT(AI)的相关系数为 0.894,CaCT 与 PET-CT(AI)的相关系数为 0.768。CaCT 与 PET-CT(reader)的 CACS ICC 为 0.911,PET-CT(reader)与 PET-CT(AI)的 ICC 为 0.958,CaCT 与 PET-CT(AI)的 ICC 为 0.842。CaCT 与 PET-CT(AI)的一致性率为 73.8%,假阴性率为 37.3%,假阳性率为 4.4%。年龄和男性与分类错误率增加相关。
PET-CT 中基于人工智能的 CACS 测量结果与冠状动脉钙 CT 的 CACS 结果相当。然而,相对较高的假阴性结果和低估的趋势值得关注。
自动化钙评分在 PET-CT 中的应用可能会从已知易患冠状动脉疾病的癌症患者中筛选出患有冠状动脉疾病高危的患者,并对他们进行常规的 PET-CT 扫描。
• 癌症患者易患冠状动脉疾病,PET-CT 可能可用于计算冠状动脉钙评分(CACS)。• PET-CT 中基于人工智能的钙评分自动提供与冠状动脉钙 CT 的 CACS 高度相关的 ICC。• 然而,PET-CT 中 CACS 计算的低估和假阴性应加以考虑。