RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, #600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Apr;39(5):798-807. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08504-w. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
Hospice positively impacts care at the end of life for patients and their families. However, compared to the general Medicare population, patients on dialysis are half as likely to receive hospice. Concurrent hospice and dialysis care offers an opportunity to improve care for people living with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).
We sought to (1) develop a conceptual model of the Program and (2) identify key components, resources, and considerations for further implementation.
We conducted a template analysis of qualitative interviews and convened a community advisory panel (CAP) to get feedback on current concurrent care design and considerations for dissemination and implementation.
Thirty-nine patients with late-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD), family caregivers, bereaved family caregivers, hospice clinicians, nephrology clinicians, administrators, and policy experts participated in interviews. A purposive subset of 19 interviewees composed the CAP.
Qualitative feedback on concurrent care design refinements, implementation, and resources.
Participants identified four themes that define an effective model of concurrent hospice and dialysis: it requires (1) timely goals-of-care conversations and (2) an interdisciplinary approach; (3) clear guidelines ensure smooth transitions for patients and families; and (4) hospice payment policy must support concurrent care. CAP participants provided feedback on the phases of an effective model of concurrent hospice and dialysis, and resources, including written and interactive educational materials, communication tools, workflow processes, and order sets.
We developed a conceptual model for concurrent hospice and dialysis care and a corresponding resource list. In addition to policy changes, clinical implementation and educational resources can facilitate scalable and equitable dissemination of concurrent care. Concurrent hospice and dialysis care must be systematically evaluated via a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial that includes the resources outlined herein, based on our conceptual model of concurrent care delivery.
临终关怀对患者及其家属的临终护理有积极影响。然而,与普通医疗保险人群相比,接受透析的患者接受临终关怀的可能性只有一半。同时进行临终关怀和透析治疗为改善终末期肾病(ESKD)患者的护理提供了机会。
我们旨在(1)制定该计划的概念模型,(2)确定关键组成部分、资源和进一步实施的考虑因素。
我们对定性访谈进行了模板分析,并召集了一个社区咨询小组(CAP),以获取对当前同时进行的护理设计的反馈意见以及传播和实施的考虑因素。
39 名晚期慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者、家庭照顾者、丧亲家庭照顾者、临终关怀临床医生、肾脏病临床医生、管理人员和政策专家参加了访谈。19 名受访者中的一个有目的的子集组成了 CAP。
对同时进行的护理设计改进、实施和资源的定性反馈。
参与者确定了定义有效的同时进行的临终关怀和透析模型的四个主题:它需要(1)及时进行治疗目标的对话和(2)跨学科方法;(3)明确的指南确保患者和家庭的平稳过渡;以及(4)临终关怀支付政策必须支持同时进行的护理。CAP 参与者对有效的同时进行的临终关怀和透析模型的各个阶段以及资源提供了反馈,包括书面和互动教育材料、沟通工具、工作流程和医嘱集。
我们制定了一个同时进行的临终关怀和透析护理的概念模型,并列出了相应的资源清单。除了政策变化外,临床实施和教育资源可以促进同时进行的护理的可扩展和公平传播。基于我们的同时护理交付概念模型,必须通过包括本文所述资源的混合实施-有效性试验来系统地评估同时进行的临终关怀和透析护理。