Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J Neural Eng. 2023 Nov 22;20(6). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad0c60.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an emerging treatment option for a myriad of medical disorders, where the method of delivering electrical pulses can vary depending on the clinical indication. In this study, we investigated the relative effectiveness of electrically activating the cervical vagus nerve among three different approaches: nerve cuff electrode stimulation (NCES), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and enhanced TENS (eTENS). The objectives were to characterize factors that influenced nerve activation and to compare the nerve recruitment properties as a function of nerve fiber diameter.The Finite Element Model, based on data from the Visible Human Project, was implemented in COMSOL. The three simulation types were compared under a range of vertical and horizontal displacements relative to the location of the vagus nerve. Monopolar anodic stimulation was examined, along with latency and activation of different fiber sizes. Nerve activation was determined via the activating function and McIntyre-Richardson-Grill models, and activation thresholds were validated in anrodent model.While NCES produced the lowest activation thresholds, eTENS generally performed superior to TENS under the range of conditions and fiber diameters, producing activation thresholds up to three times lower than TENS. eTENS also preserved its enhancement when surface electrodes were displaced away from the nerve. Anodic stimulation revealed an inhibitory region that removed eTENS benefits. eTENS also outperformed TENS by up to four times when targeting smaller diameter nerve fibers, scaling similar to a cuff electrode. In latency and activation of smaller diameter nerve fibers, eTENS results resembled those of NCES more than a TENS electrode. Activation threshold ratios were consistent invalidation.Our findings expand upon previously identified mechanisms for eTENS and further demonstrate how eTENS emulates a nerve cuff electrode to achieve lower activation thresholds. This work further characterizes considerations required for VNS under the three stimulation methods.
迷走神经刺激(Vagus nerve stimulation,VNS)是一种新兴的治疗方法,可用于多种医学疾病,其电脉冲的传递方式可能因临床适应证而异。在这项研究中,我们研究了三种不同方法刺激迷走神经的相对有效性:神经袖带电极刺激(nerve cuff electrode stimulation,NCES)、经皮电神经刺激(transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation,TENS)和增强型经皮电神经刺激(enhanced TENS,eTENS)。我们的目标是确定影响神经激活的因素,并比较不同神经纤维直径的神经募集特性。
基于可视人计划的数据,使用 COMSOL 中的有限元模型(Finite Element Model)。在相对于迷走神经位置的一系列垂直和水平位移下,对三种模拟类型进行了比较。检查了单极阳极刺激以及不同纤维尺寸的潜伏期和激活。通过激活函数和 McIntyre-Richardson-Grill 模型确定神经激活,在啮齿动物模型中验证激活阈值。
虽然 NCES 产生的激活阈值最低,但在各种条件和纤维直径下,eTENS 通常比 TENS 表现更好,产生的激活阈值比 TENS 低三倍。当表面电极从神经上移位时,eTENS 也保持了增强效果。阳极刺激产生了一个抑制区,消除了 eTENS 的益处。当靶向较小直径的神经纤维时,eTENS 甚至比 TENS 高出四倍,其效果与袖带电极相似。在较小直径神经纤维的潜伏期和激活方面,eTENS 的结果比 TENS 电极更类似于 NCES。激活阈值比与以往研究一致,证明了 eTENS 如何模拟神经袖带电极以实现更低的激活阈值。
这项工作进一步描述了三种刺激方法下 VNS 所需的考虑因素。