Suppr超能文献

痴呆症预防:孟德尔随机化视角。

Dementia prevention: the Mendelian randomisation perspective.

机构信息

Mental Health of Older People, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK

Epidemiology & Applied Clinical Research, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 13;95(4):384-390. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332293.

Abstract

Understanding the causes of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias remains a challenge. Observational studies investigating dementia risk factors are limited by the pervasive issues of confounding, reverse causation and selection biases. Conducting randomised controlled trials for dementia prevention is often impractical due to the long prodromal phase and the inability to randomise many potential risk factors. In this essay, we introduce Mendelian randomisation as an alternative approach to examine factors that may prevent or delay Alzheimer's disease. Mendelian randomisation is a causal inference method that has successfully identified risk factors and treatments in various other fields. However, applying this method to dementia risk factors has yielded unexpected findings. Here, we consider five potential explanations and provide recommendations to enhance causal inference from Mendelian randomisation studies on dementia. By employing these strategies, we can better understand factors affecting dementia risk.

摘要

了解阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的病因仍然是一个挑战。观察性研究调查痴呆症的危险因素受到混杂、反向因果关系和选择偏倚等普遍问题的限制。由于前驱期长和无法对许多潜在的危险因素进行随机化,进行痴呆症预防的随机对照试验通常不切实际。在这篇文章中,我们介绍了孟德尔随机化作为一种替代方法来研究可能预防或延缓阿尔茨海默病的因素。孟德尔随机化是一种因果推理方法,已成功在其他领域确定了风险因素和治疗方法。然而,将这种方法应用于痴呆症的危险因素得出了意外的结果。在这里,我们考虑了五个潜在的解释,并提供了增强孟德尔随机化研究对痴呆症因果推理的建议。通过采用这些策略,我们可以更好地了解影响痴呆症风险的因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验