Berete Finaba, Demarest Stefaan, Charafeddine Rana, De Ridder Karin, Van Oyen Herman, Van Hoof Wannes, Bruyère Olivier, Van der Heyden Johan
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, Brussels, 1050, Belgium.
Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Arch Public Health. 2023 Nov 15;81(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01213-0.
In recent years, the linkage of survey data to health administrative data has increased. This offers new opportunities for research into the use of health services and public health. Building on the HISlink use case, the linkage of Belgian Health Interview Survey (BHIS) data and Belgian Compulsory Health Insurance (BCHI) data, this paper provides an overview of the practical implementation of linking data, the outcomes in terms of a linked dataset and of the studies conducted as well as the lessons learned and recommendations for future links.Individual BHIS 2013 and 2018 data was linked to BCHI data using the national register number. The overall linkage rate was 92.3% and 94.2% for HISlink 2013 and HISlink 2018, respectively. Linked BHIS-BCHI data were used in validation studies (e.g. self-reported breast cancer screening; chronic diseases, polypharmacy), in policy-driven research (e.g., mediation effect of health literacy in the relationship between socioeconomic status and health related outcomes, and in longitudinal study (e.g. identifying predictors of nursing home admission among older BHIS participants). The linkage of both data sources combines their strengths but does not overcome all weaknesses.The availability of a national register number was an asset for HISlink. Policy-makers and researchers must take initiatives to find a better balance between the right to privacy of respondents and society's right to evidence-based information to improve health. Researchers should be aware that the procedures necessary to implement a link may have an impact on the timeliness of their research. Although some aspects of HISlink are specific to the Belgian context, we believe that some lessons learned are useful in an international context, especially for other European Union member states that collect similar data.
近年来,调查数据与卫生行政数据的关联有所增加。这为卫生服务利用和公共卫生研究提供了新机遇。本文以HISlink用例为基础,即比利时健康访谈调查(BHIS)数据与比利时强制健康保险(BCHI)数据的关联,概述了数据关联的实际实施情况、关联数据集的成果以及所开展的研究,同时总结了经验教训并对未来的数据关联提出建议。2013年和2018年的个体BHIS数据通过国家登记号与BCHI数据进行了关联。HISlink 2013和HISlink 2018的总体关联率分别为92.3%和94.2%。关联后的BHIS - BCHI数据被用于验证研究(如自我报告的乳腺癌筛查;慢性病、多重用药)、政策驱动型研究(如健康素养在社会经济地位与健康相关结果关系中的中介作用)以及纵向研究(如确定老年BHIS参与者中入住养老院的预测因素)。两种数据源的关联结合了它们的优势,但并未克服所有弱点。国家登记号的可用性对HISlink来说是一项资产。政策制定者和研究人员必须主动采取措施,在受访者的隐私权与社会获取循证信息以改善健康的权利之间找到更好的平衡。研究人员应意识到实施数据关联所需的程序可能会影响其研究的及时性。尽管HISlink的某些方面特定于比利时的情况,但我们认为一些经验教训在国际背景下是有用的,特别是对于收集类似数据的其他欧盟成员国。