Suppr超能文献

聚焦解决模式下无缝隙护理管理对急性脑梗死伴吞咽障碍患者的疗效及其对营养状态和神经功能的影响。

Efficacy of Seamless Care Management Under FOCUS-PDCA for Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction Complicated with Dysphagia and its Influence on Nutritional Status and Neurological Functions.

出版信息

Altern Ther Health Med. 2024 Aug;30(8):251-257.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of seamless care management under FOCUS-PDCA for patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI) complicated with dysphagia and its influence on nutrition status and neurological functions.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients with acute cerebral infarction complicated with dysphagia admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to December 2022 were selected and divided into two groups with equal numbers. The control group received routine nursing management. The study group implemented seamless nursing management under FOCUS-PDCA based on the control group. The therapeutic effect, nutritional status, and neurological function of the two groups were compared before and after intervention. Patients in both groups were intervened for 1 month.

RESULTS

(1) After the intervention, the Water Drinking Test (WDT) Grade I and Grade II of the study group increased from 0.00% before the intervention to 32.65%, and the control group also increased from 0.00% before the intervention to 14.29% and 22.45%. , while the number of Grade III, Grade IV, and Grade V decreased in both the control group and the study group. That is, the WDT level test of both groups after the intervention was better than before the intervention, and the research group was better than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=2.732, P = .006). (2) There was no statistical significance in the GUSS score and SWAL-QOL of the two groups before the intervention (P > .05); after the intervention, the GUSS score of the control group (16.32±4.26) was lower than that of the study group (18.52±4.85) (P < .001) , the SWAL-QOL score of the control group (116.48±31.05) was lower than that of the study group (143.08±33.85) (P < .001), and the GUSS scores and SWAL-QOL of the two groups after the intervention were higher than before the intervention (P < .001). (3) Compared with the nutritional status of the two groups, there was no statistical significance in PA, ALB, and Hb before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, PA, ALB, and Hb in the control group were (218.15±27.15) and (38.67±5.84) respectively. (120.85±31.05), all lower than the study group (261.15±22.52), (42.84±6.32), (134.18±30.47) (P < .01), and the PA, ALB and Hb of the two groups after intervention were all higher than before intervention (P < .001). (4) Comparing TSF and MAMC between the two groups, there was no statistical significance in TSF and MAMC before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, TSF and MAMC in the control group were (13.84±6.38) and (28.61±4.15) respectively, both of which were low. Compared with the study group (16.94±6.69), (33.15±3.84) (P < .001), and the TSF and MAMC of the two groups after the intervention were higher than before the intervention (P < .001). (5) Comparing the neurological function and limb function between the two groups, there was no statistical significance in NIHSS and FMA before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, NIHSS and FMA in the control group were (19.64±3.52) and (48.15±4.85) respectively. The NIHSS was higher than that of the study group (16.52±3.85), and the FMA was lower than that of the study group (58.84±5.63) (P < .001). The NIHSS and FMA of both groups after the intervention were better than those before the intervention (P < .001). (6) The incidence rate of complications in the study group was 4.08%, which was lower than 18.37% in the control group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Seamless nursing management for patients with ACI and dysphagia under the FOCUS-PDCA model has obvious effects. It can effectively improve the patient's swallowing function, reduce the degree of neurological deficit, improve their nutritional status and quality of life, and has fewer complications. It can be used clinically Promote within the application.

摘要

目的

评价 FOCUS-PDCA 下无缝护理管理对急性脑梗死(ACI)合并吞咽障碍患者的疗效及其对营养状况和神经功能的影响。

方法

选取 2019 年 3 月至 2022 年 12 月我院收治的 98 例 ACI 合并吞咽障碍患者,按数字表法分为两组,每组 49 例。对照组给予常规护理管理,研究组在对照组基础上实施 FOCUS-PDCA 下的无缝护理管理。比较两组患者干预前后的治疗效果、营养状况和神经功能。两组患者均干预 1 个月。

结果

(1)干预后,研究组饮水试验(WDT)Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级比例由干预前的 0.00%上升至 32.65%,对照组由干预前的 0.00%上升至 14.29%和 22.45%,同时Ⅲ级、Ⅳ级和Ⅴ级比例下降,即两组干预后 WDT 水平测试均优于干预前,且研究组优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(Z=2.732,P=0.006)。(2)两组干预前 GUSS 评分和 SWAL-QOL 比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,对照组 GUSS 评分(16.32±4.26)低于研究组(18.52±4.85)(P<0.001),对照组 SWAL-QOL 评分(116.48±31.05)低于研究组(143.08±33.85)(P<0.001),两组干预后 GUSS 评分和 SWAL-QOL 均高于干预前(P<0.001)。(3)与两组营养状况比较,干预前 PA、ALB、Hb 比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,对照组 PA、ALB、Hb 分别为(218.15±27.15)、(38.67±5.84)、(120.85±31.05),均低于研究组(261.15±22.52)、(42.84±6.32)、(134.18±30.47)(P<0.01),两组干预后 PA、ALB、Hb 均高于干预前(P<0.001)。(4)两组 TSF 和 MAMC 比较,干预前 TSF 和 MAMC 比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,对照组 TSF 和 MAMC 分别为(13.84±6.38)、(28.61±4.15),均低于研究组(16.94±6.69)、(33.15±3.84)(P<0.001),两组干预后 TSF 和 MAMC 均高于干预前(P<0.001)。(5)两组神经功能和肢体功能比较,干预前 NIHSS 和 FMA 比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,对照组 NIHSS 和 FMA 分别为(19.64±3.52)、(48.15±4.85),均高于研究组(16.52±3.85)、(58.84±5.63)(P<0.001),两组干预后 NIHSS 和 FMA 均优于干预前(P<0.001)。(6)研究组并发症发生率为 4.08%,低于对照组的 18.37%(P<0.05)。

结论

ACI 合并吞咽障碍患者应用 FOCUS-PDCA 模式下的无缝护理管理效果显著,能有效改善患者吞咽功能,降低神经功能缺损程度,提高其营养状况和生活质量,且并发症发生率较低,值得临床推广应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验