Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0290871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290871. eCollection 2023.
In the short term, parental presence while a human infant is in pain buffers the immediate pain responses, although emerging evidence suggests repeated social buffering of pain may have untoward long-term effects.
METHODS/FINDING: To explore the short- and long-term impacts of social buffering of pain, we first measured the infant rat pup's [postnatal day (PN) 8, or 12] response to mild tail shock with the mother present compared to shock alone or no shock. Shock with the mother reduced pain-related behavioral activation and USVs of pups at both ages and reduced Fos expression in the periaqueductal gray, hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, and the amygdala at PN12 only. At PN12, shock with the mother compared to shock alone differentially regulated expression of several hundred genes related to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and neural development, whereas PN8 pups showed a less robust and less coherent expression pattern. In a second set of experiments, pups were exposed to daily repeated Shock-mother pairings (or controls) at PN5-9 or PN10-14 (during and after pain sensitive period, respectively) and long-term outcome assessed in adults. Shock+mother pairing at PN5-9 reduced adult carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia and reduced Fos expression, but PN10-14 pairings had minimal impact. The effect of infant treatment on adult affective behavior showed a complex treatment by age dependent effect. Adult social behavior was decreased following Shock+mother pairings at both PN5-9 and PN10-14, whereas shock alone had no effect. Adult fear responses to a predator odor were decreased only by PN10-14 treatment and the infant Shock alone and Shock+mother did not differ.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, integrating these results into our understanding of long-term programming by repeated infant pain experiences, the data suggest that pain experienced within a social context impacts infant neurobehavioral responses and initiates an altered developmental trajectory of pain and affect processing that diverges from experiencing pain alone.
在短期内,当人类婴儿感到疼痛时,父母的陪伴可以缓冲即时的疼痛反应,尽管新出现的证据表明,反复的社会疼痛缓冲可能会产生不良的长期影响。
方法/发现:为了探索社会疼痛缓冲的短期和长期影响,我们首先测量了 [出生后第 8 天(PN8)或 12 天] 幼鼠对轻度尾部电击的反应,同时有母亲陪伴、单独接受电击或不接受电击。在两个年龄段,母亲陪伴下的电击均减少了与疼痛相关的幼鼠行为激活和 USV,并仅在 PN12 时减少了periaqueductal 灰色、下丘脑室旁核和杏仁核中的 Fos 表达。在 PN12 时,与单独接受电击相比,母亲陪伴下的电击对与 G 蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)和神经发育相关的数百个基因的表达进行了差异调节,而 PN8 幼鼠的表达模式则不那么稳健和一致。在第二组实验中,幼鼠在 PN5-9 或 PN10-14 日龄时(分别在疼痛敏感期内和之后)每天接受重复的 Shock-mother 配对(或对照)处理,并在成年后评估长期结果。PN5-9 时的 Shock+mother 配对减少了成年卡拉胶诱导的热痛觉过敏,并减少了 Fos 表达,但 PN10-14 配对的影响最小。婴儿期处理对成年情感行为的影响表现出复杂的处理与年龄依赖效应。在 PN5-9 和 PN10-14 时,Shock+mother 配对后成年社会行为减少,而单独的 Shock 则没有影响。只有在 PN10-14 处理时,幼鼠对捕食者气味的恐惧反应才会减少,而单独的 Shock 和 Shock+mother 则没有差异。
结论/意义:总的来说,将这些结果纳入我们对反复婴儿疼痛经历的长期编程的理解中,数据表明,在社会环境中经历的疼痛会影响婴儿的神经行为反应,并启动疼痛和情感处理的改变发育轨迹,与单独经历疼痛不同。