• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Study of Complications Associated with Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy.低温等离子刀扁桃体切除术与传统扁桃体切除术并发症的对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec;75(4):2870-2877. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03872-5. Epub 2023 May 20.
2
Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcome of Cold Steel Dissection versus Coblation Technique in Tonsillectomy.扁桃体切除术中冷钢剥离术与低温等离子消融术的临床及功能结局比较
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2022 Mar 13;19(4):820-823. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v19i04.3961.
3
Comparative Study of Pain Scale Assessment Between Cold Verses Hot Tonsillectomy Method.冷与热扁桃体切除方法疼痛量表评估的比较研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):5258-5261. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01942-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
Harmonic Scalpel Versus Coblation Tonsillectomy A Comparative Study.谐波手术刀与低温等离子体扁桃体切除术的对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec;71(4):498-503. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01679-x. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Coblation versus cold dissection in paediatric tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童扁桃体切除术中的低温等离子消融术与冷剥离术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Mar;134(3):197-204. doi: 10.1017/S0022215120000377. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
6
Tonsillectomy by Cold Dissection and Coblation Techniques: A Prospective Comparative Study.冷剥离与低温等离子消融技术扁桃体切除术:一项前瞻性对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Oct;71(Suppl 1):665-670. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1472-7. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
Coblation tonsillectomy: is it inherently bloody?低温等离子扁桃体切除术:是否本质上出血较多?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Feb;269(2):579-83. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1609-8. Epub 2011 May 6.
8
Coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy: a comparison of intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss and post-operative pain.低温等离子扁桃体切除术与剥离扁桃体切除术:术中时间、术中出血量及术后疼痛的比较
Med J Malaysia. 2014 Apr;69(2):74-8.
9
Coblation tonsillectomy versus cold steel dissection tonsillectomy: a morphological study.
J Laryngol Otol. 2019 Sep;133(9):770-774. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119001762. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
10
Coblation tonsillectomy: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, clinical and histopathological comparison with dissection-ligation, monopolar electrocautery and laser tonsillectomies.低温等离子体扁桃体切除术:与剥离结扎术、单极电烙术和激光扁桃体切除术的前瞻性、双盲、随机临床及组织病理学比较
J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Mar;122(3):282-90. doi: 10.1017/S002221510700093X. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Cold Dissection (Suture vs. Ligation) and Hot Dissection Tonsillectomy in Children: Postoperative Pain, Bleeding, and Operative Time.儿童冷解剖(缝合与结扎)与热解剖扁桃体切除术的比较评估:术后疼痛、出血及手术时间
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 15;14(18):6491. doi: 10.3390/jcm14186491.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations between socioeconomic status and race with complications after tonsillectomy in children.儿童扁桃体切除术后社会经济地位和种族与并发症之间的关联。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec;151(6):1055-60. doi: 10.1177/0194599814552647. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
2
Coblation vs. Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults.低温等离子射频消融术与电凝切除术治疗青少年及成人扁桃体的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jun;6(2):90-3. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2013.6.2.90. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized controlled trial.低温等离子射频消融术与传统扁桃体切除术:一项双盲随机对照试验。
J Res Med Sci. 2012 Jan;17(1):45-50.
4
Randomised comparative study of adenotonsillectomy by conventional and coblation method for children with obstructive sleep apnoea.传统手术与低温等离子消融术治疗儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的随机对照研究
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jun;76(6):816-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.049. Epub 2012 Mar 18.
5
Is the systemic inflammatory reaction to surgery responsible for post-operative pain after tonsillectomy, and is it "technique-related"?手术引起的全身炎症反应是否是扁桃体切除术后疼痛的原因,它与“技术相关”吗?
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2011 Aug;123(15-16):479-84. doi: 10.1007/s00508-011-0020-1. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
6
Tonsillectomy in children: a five-factor analysis among three techniques--reporting upon clinical results, anesthesia time, surgery time, bleeding, and cost.儿童扁桃体切除术:三种技术的五因素分析——报告临床结果、麻醉时间、手术时间、出血和成本。
Laryngoscope. 2010 Dec;120(12):2502-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.21128.
7
[Low-temperature coblation-assisted versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy in surgeries for children].儿童手术中低温等离子辅助扁桃体切除术与传统剥离扁桃体切除术的比较
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;23(15):690-2.
8
Molecular resonance vs. coblation tonsillectomy in children.儿童分子共振与低温等离子体扁桃体切除术的对比
Laryngoscope. 2009 Oct;119(10):1897-901. doi: 10.1002/lary.20210.
9
A randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative pain in children undergoing tonsillectomy using cold steel dissection with bipolar haemostasis versus coblation technique.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Jun;34(3):225-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01932.x.
10
Postoperative morbidity and histopathologic characteristics of tonsillar tissue following coblation tonsillectomy in children: a prospective randomized single-blind study.儿童低温等离子体扁桃体切除术后扁桃体组织的术后发病率及组织病理学特征:一项前瞻性随机单盲研究
Coll Antropol. 2009 Mar;33(1):293-8.

低温等离子刀扁桃体切除术与传统扁桃体切除术并发症的对比研究

Comparative Study of Complications Associated with Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy.

作者信息

Chaudhary Kanchan, Singh Vishwambhar, Yadav Ramraj, Chaudhary Ashvanee Kumar, Kumar Rajesh, Gupta Deepak Kumar, Verma Jyoti Kumar

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Government Medical College & Super Facility Hospital, Azamgarh, India.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec;75(4):2870-2877. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03872-5. Epub 2023 May 20.

DOI:10.1007/s12070-023-03872-5
PMID:37974731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10645949/
Abstract

Tonsillectomy is one of the most common ear, nose and throat surgical procedure, carried out worldwide. Amongst the various method of tonsillectomy (diathermy, laser, harmonic scalpel, radiofrequency cautery cryosurgery and coblation), dissection and snare method is commonest procedure done by otorhinolaryngologist. To compare the post operative complications associated with coblation versus conventional cold-dissection steel tonsillectomy. We carried out the prospective study of complications associated with coblation versus conventional cold steel tonsillectomy in postoperative pain, anesthesia, hemorrhage, fever, pharyngitis, injury of adjacent structure & cautery burn. Average blood loss on Coblation side was 18.74 ml while on conventional side it was 44.2 ml. Post operative pain score, injury to adjacent structure and cautery burn were found to be significantly decreased in coblation. No such difference was observed in pharyngitis and fever in both methods. The use of coblator reduces the post-operative pain, peri or post-operative blood loss, injury to adjacent structure & cautery burn too.

摘要

扁桃体切除术是全球范围内最常见的耳鼻喉科外科手术之一。在各种扁桃体切除方法(透热疗法、激光、超声刀、射频烧灼、冷冻手术和低温等离子消融术)中,剥离圈套法是耳鼻喉科医生最常进行的手术。为了比较低温等离子消融术与传统冷剥离钢制扁桃体切除术相关的术后并发症。我们对低温等离子消融术与传统冷钢制扁桃体切除术在术后疼痛、麻醉、出血、发热、咽炎、邻近结构损伤及烧灼伤方面的并发症进行了前瞻性研究。低温等离子消融术一侧的平均失血量为18.74毫升,而传统方法一侧为44.2毫升。发现低温等离子消融术在术后疼痛评分、邻近结构损伤及烧灼伤方面明显降低。两种方法在咽炎和发热方面未观察到此类差异。使用低温等离子刀也可减轻术后疼痛、术中和术后失血量、邻近结构损伤及烧灼伤。