• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低温等离子射频消融术与传统扁桃体切除术:一项双盲随机对照试验。

Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Omrani Mohammadreza, Barati Behrouz, Omidifar Navid, Okhovvat Ahmad Reza, Hashemi Seyed Amirhossein Ghazizadeh

机构信息

Otorhinolaryngologist, Sadi Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Res Med Sci. 2012 Jan;17(1):45-50.

PMID:23248656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3523437/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coblation tonsillectomy is a new surgical technique and demands further research to be proven as a suitable and standard method of tonsillectomy. This study compares coblation and traditional tonsillectomy techniques in view of their advantages and complications.

METHODS

In a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial information on operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, time needed to regain the normal diet and activity and postoperative hemorrhage were gathered and compared between two groups containing 47 patients in each group.

RESULTS

We found statistically significant differences in operation time (p < 0.05), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.05), postoperative pain (p < 0.001), time needed to find back the normal diet (p < 0.001) and normal activity (p < 0.001). However, post operation hemorrhage (p > 0.5) was not significantly different between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed a significantly less intraoperative or postoperative complications and morbidity in coblation tonsillectomy in comparison with traditional method. Coblation was associated with less pain and quick return to normal diet and daily activity. These findings addressed coblation tonsillectomy as an advanced method.

摘要

背景

低温等离子体扁桃体切除术是一种新的手术技术,需要进一步研究以证明其作为一种合适的标准扁桃体切除方法的可行性。本研究从优点和并发症方面比较低温等离子体扁桃体切除术和传统扁桃体切除技术。

方法

在一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验中,收集并比较了两组患者(每组47例)的手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛、恢复正常饮食和活动所需时间以及术后出血情况。

结果

我们发现两组在手术时间(p < 0.05)、术中出血量(p < 0.05)、术后疼痛(p < 0.001)、恢复正常饮食所需时间(p < 0.001)和恢复正常活动所需时间(p < 0.001)方面存在统计学显著差异。然而,两组术后出血情况(p > 0.5)无显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,与传统方法相比,低温等离子体扁桃体切除术的术中或术后并发症及发病率显著降低。低温等离子体扁桃体切除术疼痛较轻,能更快恢复正常饮食和日常活动。这些发现表明低温等离子体扁桃体切除术是一种先进的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ff4/3523437/1ae1ccbca564/JRMS-17-45-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ff4/3523437/1ae1ccbca564/JRMS-17-45-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ff4/3523437/1ae1ccbca564/JRMS-17-45-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized controlled trial.低温等离子射频消融术与传统扁桃体切除术:一项双盲随机对照试验。
J Res Med Sci. 2012 Jan;17(1):45-50.
2
Harmonic Scalpel Versus Coblation Tonsillectomy A Comparative Study.谐波手术刀与低温等离子体扁桃体切除术的对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec;71(4):498-503. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01679-x. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
3
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.用于扁桃体切除术的低温等离子消融术与其他手术技术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub3.
4
Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.低温等离子射频消融术与传统扁桃体切除术:一项双盲随机对照试验
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Oct;71(Suppl 1):172-175. doi: 10.1007/s12070-017-1189-z. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
5
Traditional and Coblation Tonsillectomy in Pediatrics Population: A Comparative Study.儿科人群中传统扁桃体切除术与低温等离子扁桃体切除术的比较研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):6414-6421. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01874-1. Epub 2020 May 8.
6
A pilot randomized controlled trial of coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy haemostasis.一项关于消融扁桃体切除术与双极电凝止血剥离扁桃体切除术的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2007 Aug;32(4):261-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01468.x.
7
Coblation versus unipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patients.低温等离子体消融术与单极电烙术扁桃体切除术:一项针对成年患者的前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。
Laryngoscope. 2006 Aug;116(8):1303-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000225944.00189.e9.
8
Coblation vs electrocautery tonsillectomy: postoperative recovery in adults.低温等离子体消融术与电烙术扁桃体切除术:成人术后恢复情况
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Nov;135(5):699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.03.008.
9
Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcome of Cold Steel Dissection versus Coblation Technique in Tonsillectomy.扁桃体切除术中冷钢剥离术与低温等离子消融术的临床及功能结局比较
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2022 Mar 13;19(4):820-823. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v19i04.3961.
10
Bipolar diathermy-assisted coblation really affects post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage rate and white membrane in paediatric tonsillectomy.双极透热辅助等离子消融术确实会影响小儿扁桃体切除术后的出血率及白膜情况。
B-ENT. 2017;13(1 Suppl 27):45-49.

引用本文的文献

1
Coblator assisted excision of laryngeal paraganglioma.低温等离子刀辅助切除喉副神经节瘤
Med J Armed Forces India. 2025 Mar-Apr;81(2):236-239. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2024.10.015. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
2
Comparative Study of Complications Associated with Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy.低温等离子刀扁桃体切除术与传统扁桃体切除术并发症的对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec;75(4):2870-2877. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03872-5. Epub 2023 May 20.
3
Improvement of Surgical View and Working Space at the Lower Pole by Three-Dimensional Exoscope-Assisted Coblation Tonsillectomy: A Case Series.

本文引用的文献

1
Dissection versus diathermy for tonsillectomy.扁桃体切除术的剥离法与透热法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;2011(3):CD002211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002211.pub2.
2
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.用于扁桃体切除术的低温等离子消融术与其他手术技术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub2.
3
Key messages from the National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit.国家前瞻性扁桃体切除术审计的关键信息。
三维内窥镜辅助等离子扁桃体切除术改善下极手术视野和工作空间:病例系列研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 29;59(2):259. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020259.
4
Traditional and Coblation Tonsillectomy in Pediatrics Population: A Comparative Study.儿科人群中传统扁桃体切除术与低温等离子扁桃体切除术的比较研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):6414-6421. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01874-1. Epub 2020 May 8.
5
A Comparative Study of Cold Dissection Tonsillectomy and Harmonic Scalpel Tonsillectomy Under Microscope- Our Experience.显微镜下冷剥离扁桃体切除术与超声刀扁桃体切除术的对比研究——我们的经验
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):5395-5403. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02586-w. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
6
Coblation Versus Cold Dissection Tonsillectomy: A Comparative Study.等离子消融术与冷刀扁桃体切除术:一项对比研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):5706-5711. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03079-0. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
7
Comparative Study of Pain Scale Assessment Between Cold Verses Hot Tonsillectomy Method.冷与热扁桃体切除方法疼痛量表评估的比较研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):5258-5261. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01942-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
Effect of a low temperature plasma knife on the treatment of chronic tonsillitis and its effect on T lymphocyte subsets.低温等离子刀治疗慢性扁桃体炎的效果及其对T淋巴细胞亚群的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):2447-2455. eCollection 2021.
9
Endoscope holder-assisted endoscopic coblation tonsillectomy.内镜持柄辅助内镜下扁桃体等离子切除术。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;277(11):3223-3226. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06249-4. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
10
Tonsillectomy by Cold Dissection and Coblation Techniques: A Prospective Comparative Study.冷剥离与低温等离子消融技术扁桃体切除术:一项前瞻性对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Oct;71(Suppl 1):665-670. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1472-7. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
Laryngoscope. 2007 Apr;117(4):717-24. doi: 10.1097/mlg.0b013e318031f0b0.
4
Coblation vs electrocautery tonsillectomy: postoperative recovery in adults.低温等离子体消融术与电烙术扁桃体切除术:成人术后恢复情况
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Nov;135(5):699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.03.008.
5
Postoperative pain following coblation tonsillectomy: randomized clinical trial.低温等离子体扁桃体切除术后的疼痛:随机临床试验
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Apr;76(4):226-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03700.x.
6
Comparison of posttonsillectomy pain using the ultrasonic scalpel, coblator, and electrocautery.使用超声刀、低温等离子刀和电灼术进行扁桃体切除术后疼痛的比较。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jan;134(1):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.09.027.
7
A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of coblation versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy on post-operative symptoms.一项关于低温等离子消融术与传统剥离法扁桃体切除术术后症状的双盲随机对照试验。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Apr;30(2):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00953.x.
8
Surgical advances in tonsillectomy: report of a roundtable discussion.扁桃体切除术的外科进展:圆桌讨论报告
Ear Nose Throat J. 2004 Aug;83(8 Suppl 3):4-13; quiz 14-5.
9
Pediatric total tonsillectomy using coblation compared to conventional electrosurgery: a prospective, controlled single-blind study.与传统电外科手术相比,使用低温等离子刀进行小儿全扁桃体切除术:一项前瞻性、对照单盲研究。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jun;130(6):666-75. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.02.012.
10
Double-blind randomized controlled study of coblation tonsillotomy versus coblation tonsillectomy on postoperative pain.低温等离子体扁桃体切除术与低温等离子体扁桃体摘除术治疗术后疼痛的双盲随机对照研究
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Dec;28(6):503-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00750.x.