Sansom Garett T, Hernandez Ruby, Johnson Jacquita N, Newman Galen, Atoba Kayode, Masterson Jaimie Hicks, Davis Deidra, Fawkes Leanne S
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M School of Public Health, 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, United States.
Department of Health Promotion, Texas A&M School of Public Health, 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, United States.
Clim Risk Manag. 2023;40. doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2023.100507. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
Evidence has conclusively revealed that environmental justice communities experience poor environmental conditions compared to more affluent majority communities. However, there has been little research evaluating the health impacts of immediate proximity to industrial pursuits and flood events on a population compared to others living within the same community who are only marginally removed from these locations. This cross-sectional study (N = 130) utilized three approaches to assess health outcomes (1) the 12 item Short Form Health Survey, which creates a general physical component score, (2) self-reported noncancerous chronic conditions, and (3) self-reported diagnosis of twelve different cancers. Three risk levels were spatially created using a 5-scale ordinal score for each residential parcel based on the corresponding flood probability level and proximity to facilities which report to the United States Environmental Protection Agencies Toxic Release Inventory. Analysis revealed that general physical health scores were significantly lower (P-value < 0.001) in the medium and high-risk locations, Similarly chronic conditions witnessed a non-significant twofold increased risk in the highest-risk locations compared to the lowest (POR 1.91; 95 % CI 0.82-4.39) and a non-significant increased risk of cancer diagnosis (POR 1.51; 95 % CI 0.38-5.99). This research underscores the importance of place and health outcomes even within relatively geographically compact communities. Public health and urban planning interventions and designs should take into account fine grain approaches to respond to community needs while still being mindful of limited resources.
有确凿证据表明,与较为富裕的多数群体社区相比,环境正义社区面临着恶劣的环境状况。然而,与同一社区内距离这些地点稍远的其他人相比,很少有研究评估紧邻工业活动和洪水事件对人群健康的影响。这项横断面研究(N = 130)采用了三种方法来评估健康结果:(1)12项简短健康调查问卷,该问卷可得出总体身体成分得分;(2)自我报告的非癌性慢性病;(3)自我报告的十二种不同癌症的诊断情况。根据相应的洪水概率水平以及与向美国环境保护局有毒物质排放清单报告的设施的接近程度,使用5级序数评分在空间上为每个居住地块创建了三个风险级别。分析表明,中高风险地区的总体身体健康得分显著较低(P值<0.001)。同样,与最低风险地区相比,最高风险地区慢性病的风险增加了两倍,但不显著(比值比1.91;95%置信区间0.82 - 4.39),癌症诊断风险增加也不显著(比值比1.51;95%置信区间0.38 - 5.99)。这项研究强调了即使在相对地理范围较小的社区内,地点与健康结果之间的重要关系。公共卫生和城市规划干预及设计应考虑采用精细的方法来满足社区需求,同时也要注意资源有限的问题。