Suppr超能文献

通过土耳其语预测性口吃清单修订版对流畅性和非流畅性言语进行初步比较。

A preliminary comparison of fluent and non-fluent speech through Turkish predictive cluttering inventory-revised.

机构信息

Akdeniz University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Turkey.

Medipol University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Turkey.

出版信息

J Fluency Disord. 2024 Mar;79:106019. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.106019. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the speech fluency performance of non-fluent participants namely people with stuttering (PWS), people with cluttering (PWC) and people with cluttering and stuttering (PWCS) with a fluent control group using the Turkish version of Predictive Cluttering Inventory-revised (TR-PCI-r).

METHODS

The study recruited non-fluent individuals (n = 60) and fluent controls (n = 60) between the ages of 6 and 55. The non-fluent group was perceptually evaluated by two speech and language pathologists (SLP). The speaking, reading and retelling samples were collected from 18 PWC, 17 PWCS, 25 PWS and 60 controls. The scores of each factor were compared. Age and gender differences were analyzed. Validity and reliability were calculated.

RESULTS

The agreement between two SLPs was found to be at the barely acceptable level (κ = 0.378). PWC and PWCS produced parallel outcomes in the speech motor area. In every other domain and in total scores, PWC were different from PWCS, PWS, and the controls. There was a variation in the total scores obtained by the children and adolescents in the PWS and between males and females in the controls. Except for three items (namely items 8, 22, 27), TR-PCI-r met the content validity criterion. Furthermore, TR-PCI-r was found to be a reliable tool as shown by ɑ> 0.70 and ICC values of between 0.75 and 0.90.

CONCLUSION

The scores from TR-PCI-r indicated that, speech motor characteristics of PWC and PWCS were similar. Other features assessed by the tool seemed to distinguish PWC from PWCS, PWS and controls.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用经过修订的土耳其版预测口吃清单(TR-PCI-r)比较非流畅参与者(即口吃者(PWS)、口吃者(PWC)和口吃和口吃者(PWCS))的言语流畅性表现与流畅对照组。

方法

该研究招募了年龄在 6 至 55 岁之间的非流畅个体(n=60)和流畅对照组(n=60)。两名言语语言病理学家(SLP)对非流畅组进行了感知评估。从 18 名 PWC、17 名 PWCS、25 名 PWS 和 60 名对照者中收集了说话、阅读和复述样本。比较了每个因素的分数。分析了年龄和性别差异。计算了有效性和可靠性。

结果

两名 SLP 的一致性被发现处于勉强可接受的水平(κ=0.378)。PWC 和 PWCS 在言语运动区产生了相似的结果。在其他每个领域和总分中,PWC 与 PWCS、PWS 和对照组不同。在 PWS 中,儿童和青少年的总分和对照组中男性和女性之间的总分存在差异。除了三个项目(即项目 8、22 和 27)之外,TR-PCI-r 符合内容有效性标准。此外,TR-PCI-r 是一种可靠的工具,其 ɑ>0.70 和 ICC 值在 0.75 至 0.90 之间。

结论

TR-PCI-r 的得分表明,PWC 和 PWCS 的言语运动特征相似。该工具评估的其他特征似乎将 PWC 与 PWCS、PWS 和对照组区分开来。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验