Department of Global Health & Social Medicine (LL, LC, ER, MA), King's College London, London, UK; Department of Sociology (LL), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Global Health & Social Medicine (LL, LC, ER, MA), King's College London, London, UK; Department of Economics (LC), Business, Mathematics and Statistics, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024 Mar;32(3):358-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.10.007. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
To estimate the impact of the UK nationwide campaign to End loneliness on loneliness and mental health outcomes among older people in England.
Quasi-experimental design, namely, a difference-in-differences approach.
Local authorities across England.
Older adults aged 65 and over participating in waves 4-8 (2008-2017) of the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA) and waves 1-9 (2009-2019) of the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS).
Loneliness was measured through the UCLA Loneliness scale. A social isolation scale with components of household composition, social contact and participation was constructed. Mental health was measured by The Centre for Epidemiological Studies of Depression (CES-D) score, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) score, and the Short-Form-12 Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS) score.
There was no evidence of change in loneliness scores over the study period. Difference-in-differences estimates suggest that explicitly developed and implemented antiloneliness strategies led to no change in loneliness scores (estimate = 0.044, SE = 0.085), social isolation caseness (estimate = 0.038, SE = 0.020) or levels of depressive symptoms (estimate = 0.130, SE = 0.165). Heterogeneity analyses indicate that antiloneliness strategies produced little impact on loneliness or mental health overall, despite small reductions in loneliness and increases in social engagement among well-educated and higher-income older adults. The results were robust to various sensitivity and robustness analyses.
Antiloneliness strategies implemented by local authorities have not generated a significant change in loneliness or mental health in older adults in England. Generating changes in loneliness in the older population might require longer periods of exposure, larger scope of intervention or more targeted strategies.
评估英国全国范围内结束孤独运动对英格兰老年人孤独感和心理健康结果的影响。
准实验设计,即差异中的差异方法。
英格兰各地的地方当局。
年龄在 65 岁及以上的老年人,参加了英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的第 4-8 波(2008-2017 年)和英国家庭纵向研究(UKHLS)的第 1-9 波(2009-2019 年)。
孤独感通过 UCLA 孤独量表进行测量。构建了一个包含家庭构成、社会接触和参与成分的社会隔离量表。心理健康通过抑郁中心流行病学研究量表(CES-D)评分、一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)评分和简短形式-12 心理健康成分综合评分(SF-12 MCS)评分来衡量。
在研究期间,孤独感评分没有变化的证据。差异中的差异估计表明,明确制定和实施的抗孤独策略并未导致孤独感评分(估计值=0.044,SE=0.085)、社会隔离病例(估计值=0.038,SE=0.020)或抑郁症状水平(估计值=0.130,SE=0.165)发生变化。异质性分析表明,尽管受教育程度较高和收入较高的老年人的孤独感有所降低,社会参与度有所增加,但抗孤独策略对孤独感或整体心理健康的影响很小。结果在各种敏感性和稳健性分析中是稳健的。
地方当局实施的抗孤独策略并未在英格兰的老年人群体中导致孤独感或心理健康状况发生显著变化。要改变老年人群体的孤独感,可能需要更长的暴露期、更大范围的干预或更有针对性的策略。