Suppr超能文献

经临床和影像学评估,腹直肌分离中重度的肥胖多产妇行腹直肌前鞘折叠式(Onlay)网片修补术。

Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Onlay Mesh Abdominoplasty in Obese Multiparous Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rectus Diastasis.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Hadramout University, Al Mukalla, Yemen.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura Univeristy, 60 El Gomhoria St, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 May;48(9):1778-1789. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03743-y. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women with multiple pregnancies often experience abdominal protrusion and/or a lax abdominal wall. Various open surgical techniques have been developed to address rectus diastasis in abdominoplasty, ranging from suture plication to mesh reinforcement. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological changes between traditional abdominal plication and the addition of non-absorbable mesh for rectus muscle (RM) diastasis repair in terms of function, postoperative outcome, and recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

This prospective retrospective study involved 63 women who underwent cosmetic tummy tuck surgery and met certain eligibility criteria. Patients with only mild diastasis recti, midline hernia, contraindications for major surgery, recent smoking history, or refusal of mesh augmentation were excluded. Clinical examination for abdominal protrusion or bulging and CT imaging was performed to check for recurrence of diastasis recti. The study included 33 patients who underwent mesh repair and 30 who underwent traditional abdominal plication. Follow-up was conducted after 1 year using CT and a questionnaire to assess various factors compared to preoperative measurements, with overall satisfaction rated on a 10-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in demographic data between the two groups. Patients who underwent mesh repair had a slightly longer hospital stay and drain duration. The average waist circumference decreased in both groups without any statistically significant difference. Objective CT showed significant reductions in both groups in inter-rectus distance, RM width and circumference, and intra-abdominal circumference compared to preoperative values. All patients expressed satisfaction with scar quality and umbilicus aesthetics, and no recurrence was detected either clinically or radiologically during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive preoperative assessment and imaging techniques like ultrasound and CT scans allow surgeons to detect postpartum changes in the abdominal wall. Mesh reinforcement may be indicated for diastasis above 4 cm in obese multiparous females. Thorough preoperative evaluation permits customized surgical plans to optimally restore abdominal wall anatomy and function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

多胎妊娠的女性常出现腹部膨隆和/或腹壁松弛。各种开放式外科技术已被开发用于解决腹成形术中的腹直肌分离,包括缝线折叠和网片加固。本研究旨在比较传统腹部折叠术与添加不可吸收网片修复腹直肌(RM)分离在功能、术后结果和复发方面的临床和影像学变化。

患者和方法

这项前瞻性回顾性研究纳入了 63 名接受美容腹部整形手术且符合一定纳入标准的女性。排除仅存在轻度腹直肌分离、中线疝、手术禁忌证、近期吸烟史或拒绝网片增强的患者。对腹部突出或膨隆进行临床检查和 CT 成像以检查腹直肌分离复发情况。研究包括 33 名接受网片修复的患者和 30 名接受传统腹部折叠术的患者。术后 1 年通过 CT 和问卷进行随访,评估与术前测量相比的各种因素,总体满意度采用 10 分李克特量表评分。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学数据无显著差异。接受网片修复的患者住院时间和引流时间稍长。两组患者的平均腰围均有所减少,但无统计学差异。客观 CT 显示两组患者的腹直肌间距离、RM 宽度和周长以及腹腔内周长与术前相比均显著减小。所有患者均对疤痕质量和脐部美观表示满意,且在随访期间均未发现临床或影像学复发。

结论

全面的术前评估和影像学技术,如超声和 CT 扫描,使外科医生能够检测到产后腹壁的变化。对于肥胖多胎女性,腹直肌分离大于 4cm 时可能需要网片加固。彻底的术前评估允许制定定制的手术计划,以最佳恢复腹壁解剖结构和功能。

证据等级 IV:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学等级的完整描述,请参考目录或 www.springer.com/00266 上的在线投稿说明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验