• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝健康(Be Well)庄园:通过持续的跨部门合作,以社区为导向、基于证据的方法减少健康不平等。

Be Well™ Acres Homes: a community-driven, evidence-based approach to reduce health inequities through sustained cross-sector partnership.

机构信息

Cancer Prevention & Control Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 7007 Bertner Ave. Unit 1628, 1MC13.2339, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

The University of Texas at Austin Center for Health Communication, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Apr;35(4):611-622. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01818-4. Epub 2023 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-023-01818-4
PMID:37979072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10960758/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Be Well Communities™ is MD Anderson's signature place-based approach for cancer prevention and control, working with communities to promote wellness and address modifiable risk factors for cancer. The purpose of this paper is to describe implementation of the planning phase of the Be Well Communities model in Acres Homes which began in 2019.

METHODS

A community advisory group (Steering Committee) including residents, non-profit organizations, health care partners, city and county agencies, plus other stakeholders, was convened and aligned through a structured process to develop shared goals, foster multisector collaboration, as measured by a stakeholder survey administered twice, and enhance community capacity to improve health outcomes through development of a Community Action Plan.

RESULTS

Clear, achievable goals were developed, multisector collaboration was enhanced, and more than 400 h of capacity building support led to a Community Action Plan initially focused on healthy eating and active living, including 15 evidence-based interventions led by 18 organizations. The majority (93%) of the Steering Committee reports that this plan reflects community priorities and will reach the residents most in need.

CONCLUSION

By listening and developing trust, the Be Well Communities team successfully worked with Acres Homes residents and organizations to enhance community capacity to address health inequities in one of Houston's most diverse and historic communities.

摘要

目的

Be Well Communities™ 是 MD 安德森癌症中心用于预防和控制癌症的一项特色地点导向方法,通过与社区合作,促进健康,解决癌症的可改变风险因素。本文旨在描述 2019 年开始在 Acres Homes 实施 Be Well Communities 模式规划阶段的情况。

方法

召集了一个社区顾问小组(指导委员会),包括居民、非营利组织、医疗保健合作伙伴、市和县机构以及其他利益攸关方,并通过结构化流程使他们达成一致,以制定共同目标,促进多部门合作,通过两次管理利益攸关方调查来衡量合作程度,并通过制定社区行动计划来增强社区改善健康结果的能力。

结果

制定了明确、可实现的目标,增强了多部门合作,超过 400 小时的能力建设支持促成了最初专注于健康饮食和积极生活的社区行动计划,其中包括 18 个组织牵头的 15 项循证干预措施。指导委员会的大多数成员(93%)表示,该计划反映了社区的优先事项,并将惠及最需要的居民。

结论

通过倾听和建立信任,Be Well Communities 团队成功地与 Acres Homes 的居民和组织合作,增强了社区解决休斯顿最多元化和最具历史意义的社区之一的健康不平等问题的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd32/10960758/389e8128bec3/10552_2023_1818_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd32/10960758/389e8128bec3/10552_2023_1818_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd32/10960758/389e8128bec3/10552_2023_1818_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Be Well™ Acres Homes: a community-driven, evidence-based approach to reduce health inequities through sustained cross-sector partnership.贝健康(Be Well)庄园:通过持续的跨部门合作,以社区为导向、基于证据的方法减少健康不平等。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Apr;35(4):611-622. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01818-4. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
2
Be Well Communities™: mobilizing communities to promote wellness and stop cancer before it starts.Be Well 社区™:动员社区促进健康,在癌症发生之前阻止它。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Aug;32(8):859-870. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01439-9. Epub 2021 May 26.
3
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
4
Enhancing the utilization of healthy living interventions among cancer survivors in historically underserved populations and communities.提高健康生活干预措施在历史上服务不足的人群和社区中的癌症幸存者中的利用率。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Aug;34(8):635-645. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01701-2. Epub 2023 May 10.
5
Multisectoral partnerships to tackle complex health issues at the community level: lessons from a Healthy Communities Approach in rural Alberta, Canada.多部门合作解决社区层面复杂的健康问题:来自加拿大艾伯塔省农村地区健康社区方法的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2022 Oct;113(5):755-763. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00653-5. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
6
Reducing risk for chronic disease: evaluation of a collective community approach to sustainable evidence-based health programming.减少慢性病风险:对基于可持续证据的集体社区方法进行健康规划的评估。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17670-3.
7
Working with communities: Meeting the health needs of those living in vulnerable communities when Primary Health Care and Universal Health Care are not available.与社区合作:在初级卫生保健和全民健康覆盖不可用时,满足生活在脆弱社区的人的健康需求。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;27(5):1056-1065. doi: 10.1111/jep.13495. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
Investigating health and social outcomes of the Big Local community empowerment initiative in England: a mixed method evaluation.调查英格兰“大地方”社区赋权计划对健康和社会结果的影响:一项混合方法评估。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Oct;11(9):1-147. doi: 10.3310/GRMA6711.
9
A stakeholder analysis of community-led collaboration to reduce health inequity in a deprived neighbourhood in South Korea.社区主导合作减少韩国贫困社区健康不平等的利益相关者分析。
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):35-44. doi: 10.1177/1757975918791517. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Be Well Baytown: Whole-Community Cancer Prevention Initiative Based on Multi-Sector Capacity and Partnership Building.贝敦健康计划:基于多部门能力和伙伴关系建设的全社区癌症预防倡议。
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251347584. doi: 10.1177/10732748251347584. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Synergies, partnership outcomes, and lessons learned: a qualitative evaluation of cancer center-coalition engagement.协同效应、伙伴关系成果及经验教训:癌症中心与联盟合作的定性评估
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Apr 30;9(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf038.
3
Enhancing food access in a comprehensive cancer center area of influence through local partner capacity building.

本文引用的文献

1
Be Well Communities™: mobilizing communities to promote wellness and stop cancer before it starts.Be Well 社区™:动员社区促进健康,在癌症发生之前阻止它。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Aug;32(8):859-870. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01439-9. Epub 2021 May 26.
2
RE-AIM in the Real World: Use of the RE-AIM Framework for Program Planning and Evaluation in Clinical and Community Settings.现实世界中的RE-AIM:将RE-AIM框架用于临床和社区环境中的项目规划与评估
Front Public Health. 2019 Nov 22;7:345. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00345. eCollection 2019.
3
Does socioeconomic status account for racial and ethnic disparities in childhood cancer survival?
通过当地合作伙伴能力建设,增强综合癌症中心影响区域的食品可及性。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(16):e70070. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70070.
4
Association of perceived neighborhood air quality problems with attempt to quit cigarette smoking: a cross-sectional study in Texas.感知到的邻里空气质量问题与尝试戒烟的关联:德克萨斯州的一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 26;12:1392065. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1392065. eCollection 2024.
5
Building and Maintaining a Whole Community Initiative: Health Communication in Practice with Be Well Communities™.建设和维护一个全社区倡议:Be Well Communities™ 中的健康传播实践。
Health Commun. 2024 Dec;39(14):3597-3605. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2382869. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
6
Implementation and Evaluation of a Multi-level, Place-Based Tobacco Prevention and Control Program at a Minority-Serving Institution in Texas.德克萨斯州一少数族裔服务机构实施和评估多层次、基于场所的烟草预防和控制项目。
Prev Sci. 2024 Aug;25(6):898-909. doi: 10.1007/s11121-024-01708-4. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
社会经济地位能否解释儿童癌症存活率的种族和民族差异?
Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;124(20):4090-4097. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31560. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
4
Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States.美国可改变的潜在风险因素导致的癌症病例和死亡人数及比例。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):31-54. doi: 10.3322/caac.21440. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
5
Disparities in race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status: risk of mortality of breast cancer patients in the California Cancer Registry, 2000-2010.种族/族裔及社会经济地位差异:2000 - 2010年加利福尼亚癌症登记处乳腺癌患者的死亡风险
BMC Cancer. 2013 Oct 2;13:449. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-449.
6
Shape Up Somerville two-year results: a community-based environmental change intervention sustains weight reduction in children.索默维尔体型计划两年结果:基于社区的环境变化干预措施可维持儿童体重减轻。
Prev Med. 2013 Oct;57(4):322-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
7
Understanding racial-ethnic disparities in health: sociological contributions.理解健康中的种族-民族差异:社会学的贡献。
J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl(Suppl):S15-27. doi: 10.1177/0022146510383838.
8
Meta-analysis of racial disparities in survival in association with socioeconomic status among men and women with colon cancer.结肠癌患者生存中种族差异与社会经济地位相关性的荟萃分析。
Cancer. 2007 Jun 1;109(11):2161-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22664.
9
Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival.种族、社会经济地位与乳腺癌治疗及生存情况
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Apr 3;94(7):490-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.7.490.
10
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.评估健康促进干预措施对公众健康的影响:RE-AIM框架。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.