• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境分权与碳排放:来自中国的证据。

Environmental decentralization and carbon emissions: evidence from China.

机构信息

School of Public Finance and Taxation, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China.

School of Finance, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(59):123193-123213. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31021-6. Epub 2023 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-31021-6
PMID:37979115
Abstract

A robust environmental management system holds great significance for the Chinese government in effectively managing the country's carbon emissions. This study delves into the spatial impact of environmental decentralization on the carbon emissions of 30 Chinese provinces spanning from 2000 to 2019. First, we found that the increase in environmental decentralization promotes carbon emissions, and this effect is primarily driven by the delegation of environmental monitoring authority and environmental supervision authority. Second, we analyzed the heterogeneity of the carbon emission effects of environmental decentralization across different regions and observed that the impact of environmental decentralization is more significant in the western region compared to the central and eastern regions. Furthermore, this study investigates how the industrial structure, government competition, and environmental regulation exert an influence on the carbon emission effects of environmental decentralization. This article presents empirical evidence from the perspective of environmental management systems that underscores the rapid escalation of carbon emissions. Additionally, it contributes to an enhanced comprehension of the economic ramifications linked to the process of environmental decentralization. At the same time, the conclusions of this article have significant practical implications for the rational design of levels of environmental decentralization, thereby accelerating the achievement of carbon neutrality.

摘要

中国政府建立健全环境管理制度对有效管理碳排放具有重要意义。本研究探讨了环境分权对中国 30 个省份 2000 年至 2019 年碳排放的空间影响。首先,我们发现环境分权的增加促进了碳排放,这种效应主要是由环境监测权和环境监督权的下放驱动的。其次,我们分析了环境分权对碳排放的异质性影响,发现环境分权对西部地区的影响比中部和东部地区更为显著。此外,本研究还考察了产业结构、政府竞争和环境规制如何影响环境分权对碳排放的影响。本文从环境管理系统的角度提供了实证证据,强调了碳排放的迅速增加。此外,它有助于更好地理解与环境分权过程相关的经济后果。同时,本文的结论对合理设计环境分权水平具有重要的实际意义,从而加速实现碳中和。

相似文献

1
Environmental decentralization and carbon emissions: evidence from China.环境分权与碳排放:来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(59):123193-123213. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31021-6. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
2
Impact of China's environmental decentralization on carbon emissions from energy consumption: an empirical study based on the dynamic spatial econometric model.中国环境分权对能源消费碳排放的影响——基于动态空间计量模型的实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(48):72140-72158. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18806-x. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
Fiscal decentralization, industrial structure upgrading, and carbon emissions: evidence from China.财政分权、产业结构升级与碳排放:来自中国的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):39210-39222. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24971-w. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
The drivers of carbon emissions in China: the perspective of fiscal decentralization.中国碳排放的驱动因素:财政分权视角
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(24):65879-65891. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27001-5. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
5
Does environmental decentralization aggravate pollution emissions? Microscopic evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises.环境分权是否会加剧污染排放?来自中国工业企业的微观证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 10;829:154640. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154640. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
6
How does financial decentralization synergies carbon reduction and pollution control in China?财政分权如何在中国促进碳减排与污染控制协同增效?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(48):106408-106420. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29600-8. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
7
Exploring the asymmetric effect of fiscal decentralization on economic growth and environmental quality: evidence from India.探讨财政分权对经济增长和环境质量的非对称影响:来自印度的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(33):80192-80209. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28009-7. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
8
Does environmental decentralization exacerbate China's carbon emissions? Evidence based on dynamic threshold effect analysis.环境分权是否加剧了中国的碳排放?基于动态门槛效应分析的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 15;721:137656. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137656. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
9
The nonlinear impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions: from the perspective of biased technological progress.财政分权对碳排放的非线性影响:基于偏向性技术进步视角
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(23):29890-29899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12833-w. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
10
Regional competition, environmental decentralization, and target selection of local governments.区域竞争、环境分权与地方政府的目标选择
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 10;755(Pt 1):142536. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142536. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Do government innovation preferences enhance ecological resilience in resource-based cities?-Based on mediating effect and threshold effect perspectives.政府创新偏好是否能增强资源型城市的生态弹性?——基于中介效应和门槛效应视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 1;19(11):e0303672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303672. eCollection 2024.