• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗓音障碍相关网络信息的质量和可读性评估。

Evaluation of quality and readability of internet information on voice disorders.

机构信息

Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Public Health. 2024 Jan;226:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.10.020. Epub 2023 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2023.10.020
PMID:37979233
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the readability and quality of Internet information related to vocal health, voice disorders and voice therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Eighty-two websites were included. Websites were then analyzed; their origin (clinic/hospital, non-profit, government), quality (Health On the Net [HON] certification and DISCERN scores) and readability (Ateşman readability formula and Bezirci-Yılmaz new readability formula) were assessed. Statistical analysis was used to examine differences between website origin and quality and readability scores and correlations between readability instruments.

RESULTS

Of the 82 websites, 93% were of private clinic/hospital, 6% were of non-profit organisation and 1% were of government. None of the 82 websites were HON certification, and the mean score of the item determining the general quality measure in DISCERN was 1.83 in a five-point scale. The mean of Ateşman readability formula value was calculated as 50.46 (±8.16). This value is defined as 'moderately hard' according to the readability scale. The average of Bezirci-Yılmaz new readability formula value is 13.85 (±3.48). This value is defined as 13th and 14th grade.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of Internet-based health information about the voice is generally inadequate, and the sites examined in this study may be limited due to high readability levels. This may be a problem in people with poor literacy skills. For this reason, it is very important for speech and language therapists and other health professionals to evaluate and monitor the quality and readability of Internet-based information.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估与嗓音健康、嗓音障碍和嗓音治疗相关的互联网信息的可读性和质量。

研究设计

这是一项横断面研究。

方法

纳入了 82 个网站。然后对这些网站进行分析,评估其来源(诊所/医院、非营利组织、政府)、质量(健康网络[HON]认证和 DISCERN 评分)和可读性(Ateşman 可读性公式和 Bezirci-Yılmaz 新可读性公式)。使用统计分析来检验网站来源和质量与可读性评分之间的差异以及可读性工具之间的相关性。

结果

在 82 个网站中,93%来自私人诊所/医院,6%来自非营利组织,1%来自政府。没有一个网站获得 HON 认证,DISCERN 中确定一般质量测量项目的五分制平均得分为 1.83。Ateşman 可读性公式值的平均值计算为 50.46(±8.16)。根据可读性量表,这个值被定义为“中等难度”。Bezirci-Yılmaz 新可读性公式值的平均值为 13.85(±3.48)。这个值被定义为 13 到 14 年级。

结论

基于互联网的有关声音的健康信息的质量普遍不足,本研究中检查的网站可能由于高可读性而受到限制。对于阅读能力较差的人来说,这可能是一个问题。因此,言语和语言治疗师以及其他卫生专业人员评估和监测基于互联网的信息的质量和可读性非常重要。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of quality and readability of internet information on voice disorders.嗓音障碍相关网络信息的质量和可读性评估。
Public Health. 2024 Jan;226:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.10.020. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
2
Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders.嗓音障碍相关英文网络信息的质量和可读性。
J Voice. 2019 May;33(3):290-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
3
Quality and readability of internet information about stuttering.互联网关于口吃的信息质量和可读性。
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Mar;67:105824. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105824. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
4
Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.耳鸣的英文互联网信息的质量与可读性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Jan;30(1):31-40. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17070. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Quality and readability of English-language internet information for aphasia.失语症英文网络信息的质量与可读性。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Feb;21(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1362034. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
6
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
7
Patient education in the digital age: An analysis of quality and readability of online information on rhinoplasty.数字化时代的患者教育:鼻整形术在线信息质量和可读性分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 9;103(32):e39229. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039229.
8
Quality and readability of English-language Internet information for vestibular disorders.关于前庭障碍的英文互联网信息的质量和可读性。
J Vestib Res. 2020;30(2):63-72. doi: 10.3233/VES-200698.
9
Quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others.听力障碍成年人及其重要他人可获取的英文网络信息的质量和可读性。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Aug;51(8):618-26. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.684406. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
10
Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.对颈部提升术在线信息的质量、可读性及技术方面的批判性分析
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):115-120. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1219.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability of Informed Consent Forms for Medical and Surgical Clinical Procedures: A Systematic Review.医疗和外科临床操作知情同意书的可读性:一项系统评价
Clin Pract. 2025 Jan 24;15(2):26. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15020026.