University of Wisconsin - Madison, Collaborative for Reproductive Equity, Madison, WI, United States.
Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA, United States.
Contraception. 2024 Mar;131:110327. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110327. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
We aimed to measure both stated and experimentally "revealed" abortion provision preferences among US people with capacity for pregnancy.
In July 2022, we recruited US residents assigned female sex at birth and aged 18 to 55 years using Prolific, an online survey hosting platform. We asked participants what first-trimester abortion method and delivery model they would prefer. We also assessed abortion care preferences with a discrete choice experiment, which examined the relative importance of the following care attributes: method, distance, wait time for appointment, delivery model (telehealth vs in-clinic), and cost.
More than half of the 887 respondents (59%) self-reported a slight (22%) or strong (37%) preference for medication compared to aspiration abortion; 11% stated no preference. Our discrete choice experiment found that cost and wait time had a greater effect on hypothetical decision-making than did method and delivery model (discrete choice experiment average importances = 44.3 and 23.2, respectively, compared to 15.9 and 8.2, respectively). Simulations indicated that holding other attributes constant, respondents preferred medication to aspiration abortion and telehealth to in-clinic care.
This study, the first to examine abortion preferences in the United States, using a discrete choice experiment, demonstrates the importance of wait time and cost in abortion care decision-making. Our work indicates that for this population, factors related to health care financing and organization may matter more than clinical aspects of care.
Although people in this study preferred medication to aspiration abortion and telehealth to in-clinic care, wait time and cost of care played a greater role in care decision-making. Focusing solely on clinical aspects of care (i.e., method, delivery model) may ignore other attributes of care that are particularly important for potential patients.
本研究旨在衡量有生育能力的美国人群中明确表达的以及通过实验“揭示”的堕胎服务偏好。
2022 年 7 月,我们通过在线调查众包平台 Prolific 招募了出生时被指定为女性且年龄在 18 至 55 岁之间的美国居民。我们询问了参与者他们在妊娠早期会首选哪种堕胎方法和分娩模式。我们还通过离散选择实验评估了堕胎护理偏好,该实验考察了以下护理属性的相对重要性:方法、距离、预约等待时间、远程医疗与门诊就诊以及费用。
在 887 名受访者中,超过一半(59%)的人自述对药物流产(22%)或强烈(37%)偏好,而 11%的人表示没有偏好。我们的离散选择实验发现,成本和等待时间对假设决策的影响大于方法和分娩模式(离散选择实验平均重要性分别为 44.3 和 23.2,而分别为 15.9 和 8.2)。模拟结果表明,在其他属性保持不变的情况下,受访者更倾向于选择药物流产而非吸宫流产,以及远程医疗而非门诊就诊。
这项研究首次使用离散选择实验在美国开展堕胎偏好研究,结果表明在堕胎护理决策中,等待时间和成本很重要。我们的研究结果表明,对于这部分人群而言,与医疗保健融资和组织相关的因素可能比护理的临床方面更重要。
尽管本研究中的参与者更倾向于药物流产而非吸宫流产,以及远程医疗而非门诊就诊,但护理等待时间和成本在护理决策中发挥了更大的作用。仅关注护理的临床方面(即方法、分娩模式)可能会忽略潜在患者特别关注的其他护理属性。