Pieroni Maurizio, Ciabatti Michele, Zocchi Chiara, Tavanti Valentina, Camporeale Antonia, Saletti Elisa, Fumagalli Carlo, Venezia Duccio, Lombardi Massimo, Olivotto Iacopo, Bolognese Leonardo
Cardiovascular Department, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.
Cardiovascular Department, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Feb 15;397:131603. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131603. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is central in the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of acute myocarditis (AM) but the timing of repeated CMR scans to assess edema resolution and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) stabilization remain unclear. We assessed edema and LGE evolution over 12 months to identify the optimal timing of repeat CMR evaluation in AM.
Thirty-three consecutive patients with AM underwent CMR at clinical presentation (CMR-1), after 3 months (CMR-2) and after 12-months (CMR-3). CMR included assessment of edema and LGE, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular mass index (LVMi). After CMR-3 patients were followed-up every three-months by clinical evaluation, Holter-monitoring, and echocardiography. All patients had edema and LGE at CMR-1. At CMR-2 edema-positive segments (0.42 ± 0.34 vs. 3.18 ± 2.33, p < 0.005), LGE (4.98 ± 4.56 vs. 9.60 ± 8.58 g, and 4.22 ± 3.97% vs 7.50 ± 5.61%) and LVMi (69.82 ± 11.83 vs 76.06 ± 13.13 g/m) (all p < 0.0001) significantly reduced, while LVEF (63.12 ± 5.47% vs.61.15 ± 6.87% p < 0.05) significantly improved, compared to CMR-1. At CMR-2 edema persisted in 7 patients (21%) but resolved at CMR-3 with no further changes of LVMi, LVEF and LGE. During follow-up (85 ± 15 months), 5 (15%) patients showed persistent ventricular arrhythmias. Univariate predictors of arrhythmic persistence were LGE extension at CMR-2 and CMR-3 (both p < 0.05), but not at CMR-1 (p = 0.07).
Most patients with uncomplicated AM show edema resolution with LGE stabilization after 3 months. Further CMR evaluations should be limited to patients with persisting edema at this time. LGE extent measured after edema resolution is associated with persistent ventricular arrhythmias.
心脏磁共振成像(CMR)在急性心肌炎(AM)的诊断和预后分层中起着核心作用,但重复进行CMR扫描以评估水肿消退和延迟钆增强(LGE)稳定化的时机仍不明确。我们评估了12个月内水肿和LGE的演变情况,以确定AM患者重复进行CMR评估的最佳时机。
33例连续的AM患者在临床表现时接受了CMR检查(CMR-1),3个月后(CMR-2)和12个月后(CMR-3)再次接受检查。CMR包括对水肿和LGE、左心室射血分数(LVEF)和左心室质量指数(LVMi)的评估。CMR-3检查后,通过临床评估、动态心电图监测和超声心动图对患者进行每三个月一次的随访。所有患者在CMR-1时均有水肿和LGE。与CMR-1相比,在CMR-2时,水肿阳性节段(0.42±0.34对3.18±2.33,p<0.005)、LGE(4.98±4.56对9.60±8.58g,以及4.22±3.97%对7.50±5.61%)和LVMi(69.82±11.83对76.06±13.13g/m)(均p<0.0001)显著降低,而LVEF(63.12±5.47%对61.15±6.87%,p<0.05)显著改善。在CMR-2时,7例患者(21%)仍有水肿,但在CMR-3时消退,LVMi、LVEF和LGE均无进一步变化。在随访期间(85±15个月),5例患者(15%)出现持续性室性心律失常。心律失常持续存在的单因素预测因素是CMR-2和CMR-3时的LGE范围(均p<0.05),但CMR-1时不是(p=0.07)。
大多数无并发症的AM患者在3个月后水肿消退,LGE稳定。此时,进一步的CMR评估应仅限于仍有持续性水肿的患者。水肿消退后测量的LGE范围与持续性室性心律失常相关。