Suppr超能文献

用植物性替代物替代红色和加工肉类,并估计其对澳大利亚成年人队列胰岛素敏感性的影响的建模。

Modelling the replacement of red and processed meat with plant-based alternatives and the estimated effect on insulin sensitivity in a cohort of Australian adults.

机构信息

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS7000, Australia.

Heart Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Nutr. 2024 Mar 28;131(6):1084-1094. doi: 10.1017/S0007114523002659. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

Abstract

Dietary guidelines are increasingly promoting mostly plant-based diets, limits on red meat consumption, and plant-based sources of protein for health and environmental reasons. It is unclear how the resulting food substitutions associate with insulin resistance, a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We modelled the replacement of red and processed meat with plant-based alternatives and the estimated effect on insulin sensitivity. We included 783 participants (55 % female) from the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health study, a population-based cohort of Australians. In adulthood, diet was assessed at three time points using FFQ: 2004–2006, 2009–2011 and 2017–2019. We calculated the average daily intake of each food group in standard serves. Insulin sensitivity was estimated from fasting glucose and insulin concentrations in 2017–2019 (aged 39–49 years) using homoeostasis model assessment. Replacing red meat with a combination of plant-based alternatives was associated with higher insulin sensitivity ( = 10·5 percentage points, 95 % CI (4·1, 17·4)). Adjustment for waist circumference attenuated this association by 61·7 %. Replacing red meat with either legumes, nuts/seeds or wholegrains was likewise associated with higher insulin sensitivity. Point estimates were similar but less precise when replacing processed meat with plant-based alternatives. Our modelling suggests that regularly replacing red meat, and possibly processed meat, with plant-based alternatives may associate with higher insulin sensitivity. Further, abdominal adiposity may be an important mediator in this relationship. Our findings support advice to prioritise plant-based sources of protein at the expense of red meat consumption.

摘要

饮食指南越来越多地提倡以植物为主的饮食,限制食用红肉,并出于健康和环境原因选择植物性蛋白质来源。目前尚不清楚由此产生的食物替代与胰岛素抵抗(2 型糖尿病的一个风险因素)有何关联。我们模拟了用植物性替代品替代红肉和加工肉,并估计了这对胰岛素敏感性的影响。我们纳入了来自澳大利亚人群的儿童期决定成人健康研究(一项基于人群的队列研究)中的 783 名参与者(55%为女性)。在成年后,使用 FFQ 在三个时间点评估了饮食:2004-2006 年、2009-2011 年和 2017-2019 年。我们以标准份计算了每种食物组的平均每日摄入量。胰岛素敏感性使用 2017-2019 年(39-49 岁)空腹血糖和胰岛素浓度,通过稳态模型评估法进行估算。用植物性替代品组合替代红肉与更高的胰岛素敏感性相关(=10.5 个百分点,95%CI(4.1,17.4))。调整腰围后,这种关联减弱了 61.7%。用豆类、坚果/种子或全谷物替代红肉同样与更高的胰岛素敏感性相关。用植物性替代品替代加工肉时,点估计值相似但精度较低。我们的模型表明,经常用植物性替代品替代红肉,可能还有加工肉,与更高的胰岛素敏感性有关。此外,腹部肥胖可能是这种关系的一个重要中介因素。我们的研究结果支持以植物性蛋白质来源替代红肉的建议,以促进红肉消费。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3056/10876457/01315be633bb/S0007114523002659_figAb.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验