Suppr超能文献

美国东南部三家医院的检测中的种族差异。

Racial disparities in testing in three southeastern US hospitals.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;45(4):429-433. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.244. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze testing in 3 hospitals in central North Carolina to validate previous racial health-disparity findings.

METHODS

We completed a retrospective analysis of inpatient tests from 2015 to 2021 at 3 university-affiliated hospitals in North Carolina. We calculated the number of tests per 1,000 patient days stratified by race: White, Black, and non-White, non-Black (NWNB). We defined a unique test as one that occurred in an inpatient unit with a matching laboratory accession ID and on differing calendar days. Tests were evaluated overall, by hospital, by year, and by positivity rate.

RESULTS

In total, 35,160 tests and 2,571,850 patient days across all 3 hospitals from 2015 to 2021 were analyzed. The median number of tests per 1,000 patient days was 13.85 (interquartile range [IQR], 9.88-16.07). Among all tests, 5,225 (15%) were positive. White patients were administered more tests (14.46 per 1,000 patient days) than Black patients (12.96; < .0001) or NWNB race patients (10.27; < .0001). Black patients were administered more tests than NWNB patients ( < .0001). White patients tested positive at a similar rate to Black patients (15% vs 15%; = .3655) and higher than NWNB individuals (12%; = .0061), and Black patients tested positive at a higher rate than NWNB patients ( = .0024).

CONCLUSION

White patients received more tests than Black and NWNB patient groups when controlling for race patient days. Future studies should control for comorbidities and investigate community onset of by race and ethnicity.

摘要

目的

分析北卡罗来纳州中部 3 家医院的检测结果,以验证先前关于种族健康差异的发现。

方法

我们对北卡罗来纳州 3 所大学附属医院 2015 年至 2021 年的住院患者检测进行了回顾性分析。我们按种族(白种人、黑种人和非白种非黑种人[NWNB])计算了每千名患者住院日的检测数量:白人、黑人、非白种非黑种人。我们将唯一的检测定义为发生在具有匹配实验室访问 ID 且在不同日历日的住院单元中的检测。总体上、按医院、按年份和按阳性率评估检测。

结果

总共分析了 2015 年至 2021 年 3 家医院的 35160 次检测和 2571850 名患者住院日。每千名患者住院日的中位数检测数量为 13.85(四分位距[IQR],9.88-16.07)。所有检测中,有 5225 次(15%)为阳性。白人患者接受的检测(每千名患者住院日 14.46 次)多于黑人患者(12.96 次;<0.0001)或非白种非黑种人患者(10.27 次;<0.0001)。黑人患者接受的检测多于非白种非黑种人患者(<0.0001)。白人患者的阳性检测率与黑人患者相似(15%比 15%;=0.3655),高于非白种非黑种人个体(12%;=0.0061),而黑人患者的阳性检测率高于非白种非黑种人患者(=0.0024)。

结论

在控制种族患者住院日的情况下,白人患者接受的检测多于黑人患者和非白种非黑种人患者群体。未来的研究应控制合并症,并按种族和民族调查社区获得性感染的发生情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e62/11007320/87c47d1f748e/S0899823X23002441_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验