Suppr超能文献

间歇性theta波爆发刺激与高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗脊髓损伤相关神经病理性疼痛的比较:一项假手术对照研究。

Comparison of intermittent theta burst stimulation and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain: A sham-controlled study.

作者信息

Kim Jong Keun, You JaeIn, Son Sangpil, Suh InHyuk, Lim Jong Youb

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daejeon Eulji University Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji University Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 Mar;48(2):241-247. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2277964. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain with sham controls, using neuropathic pain-specific evaluation tools.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

SETTING

Rehabilitation medicine department of a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-three patients with spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups (real iTBS, real rTMS, and sham rTMS). Each patient underwent five sessions of assigned stimulation.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Before and after completion of the five sessions, patients were evaluated using the self-completed Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, Numeric Rating Scale, Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, and Neuropathic Pain Scale.

RESULTS

Real iTBS and real rTMS reduced pain levels after stimulation according to all the evaluation tools, and the changes were significant when compared to the values of the sham rTMS group. No significant differences were found between the real iTBS and real rTMS groups.

CONCLUSION

Both iTBS and rTMS were effective in reducing spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain. When safety, convenience, and compliance are considered, iTBS would have an advantage over rTMS in clinical situations with spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain. This trial was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (registration no. KCT0004976).

摘要

目的

使用神经性疼痛特异性评估工具,比较间歇性θ波爆发刺激(iTBS)和高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)与假刺激对照对脊髓损伤相关神经性疼痛的影响。

设计

一项随机、双盲、假刺激对照试验。

地点

一所大学医院的康复医学科。

参与者

33例脊髓损伤相关神经性疼痛患者。

干预措施

患者被随机分配到三组之一(真iTBS组、真rTMS组和假rTMS组)。每位患者接受5次指定的刺激治疗。

观察指标

在完成5次治疗前后,使用自行填写的利兹神经病理性症状和体征评估量表、数字评定量表、神经病理性疼痛症状量表和神经病理性疼痛量表对患者进行评估。

结果

根据所有评估工具,真iTBS组和真rTMS组在刺激后疼痛水平降低,与假rTMS组的值相比,变化具有显著性。真iTBS组和真rTMS组之间未发现显著差异。

结论

iTBS和rTMS在减轻脊髓损伤相关神经性疼痛方面均有效。在考虑安全性、便利性和依从性时,在脊髓损伤相关神经性疼痛的临床情况下,iTBS比rTMS具有优势。本试验已在临床研究信息服务中心注册(注册号:KCT0004976)。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Central Neuropathic Pain.用于中枢神经性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 May 19;15:879909. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.879909. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验