Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Cardiology, North Oaks Health System, Hammond, Louisiana, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;103(1):12-19. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30914. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
Contemporary chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice has received limited study.
To examine the contemporary CTO PCI practice.
We performed an online, anonymous, international survey of CTO PCI operators.
Five hundred forty-five CTO PCI operators and 190 interventional cardiology fellows with an interest in CTO PCI participated in this survey. Almost half were from the United States (41%), most (93%) were men, and the median h/week spent in the hospital was 58. Median annual case numbers were 205 (150-328) for PCIs and 20 (5-50) for CTO PCIs. Almost one-fifth (17%) entered CTO cases into registries, such as PROGRESS-CTO (55%) and EuroCTO (20%). More than one-third worked at academic institutions (39%), 31% trained dedicated CTO fellows, and 22% proctored CTO PCI. One-third (34%) had dedicated CTO PCI days. Most (51%) never discharged CTO patients the same day, while 17% discharged CTO patients the same day >50% of the time. After successful guidewire crossing, 38% used intravascular imaging >90% of the time. Most used CTO scores including J-CTO (81%), PROGRESS-CTO (35%), and PROGRESS-CTO complications scores (30%). Coronary artery perforation was encountered within the last month by 19%. On a scale of 0-10, the median comfort levels in treating coronary artery perforation were: covered stents 8.8 (7.0-10), coil embolization 5.0 (2.1-8.5), and fat embolization 3.7 (0.6-7.3). Most (51%) participants had a complication cart/kit and 25% conducted regular complication drills with catheterization laboratory staff.
Contemporary CTO PCI practices vary widely. Further research on barriers to following the guiding principles of CTO PCI may improve patient outcomes.
当代慢性完全闭塞(CTO)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的实践受到了有限的研究。
检查当代 CTO PCI 的实践。
我们对 CTO PCI 操作人员进行了在线、匿名、国际调查。
545 名 CTO PCI 操作人员和 190 名对 CTO PCI 感兴趣的介入心脏病学研究员参加了这项调查。近一半(41%)来自美国,大多数(93%)是男性,每周在医院的工作时间中位数为 58 小时。PCI 的年度病例中位数为 205(150-328),CTO PCI 的年度病例中位数为 20(5-50)。近五分之一(17%)的人将 CTO 病例输入了登记处,如 PROGRESS-CTO(55%)和 EuroCTO(20%)。超过三分之一(39%)在学术机构工作,31%培训专门的 CTO 研究员,22%指导 CTO PCI。三分之一(34%)有专门的 CTO PCI 日。大多数(51%)的患者不会在同一天出院,而 17%的患者在同一天出院的比例超过 50%。在成功导丝穿过病变后,38%的患者超过 90%的时间使用血管内成像。大多数人使用 CTO 评分,包括 J-CTO(81%)、PROGRESS-CTO(35%)和 PROGRESS-CTO 并发症评分(30%)。在过去的一个月里,有 19%的人遇到了冠状动脉穿孔。在 0-10 的评分中,治疗冠状动脉穿孔的中位舒适度水平为:覆盖支架 8.8(7.0-10)、线圈栓塞 5.0(2.1-8.5)和脂肪栓塞 3.7(0.6-7.3)。大多数(51%)的患者都有并发症推车/工具包,25%的患者与导管室工作人员一起进行定期并发症演练。
当代 CTO PCI 的实践差异很大。进一步研究阻碍 CTO PCI 指导原则遵循的因素可能会改善患者的预后。