• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良型超声造影肝脏成像报告和数据系统在无肝细胞癌危险因素患者中的诊断性能:与世界医学和生物学超声联合会指南的比较

Diagnostic Performance of Modified Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Patients Without Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison With World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guideline.

作者信息

Zhang Yafang, Li Qing, Li Lingling, Hong Yong, Qiang Banghong, Yu Yiwen, Guo Ruohan, Deng Hanxia, Han Xu, Zou Xuebin, Guo Zhixing, Zhou Jianhua

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Dongfeng People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024 Feb;50(2):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.10.008
PMID:37985306
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the modified contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to distinguish malignancy in patients without known hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk factors and compare diagnostic accuracy with that of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) guideline across radiologists with different levels of CEUS experience.

METHODS

A total of 848 individuals with no hepatitis infection presenting with 870 lesions in non-cirrhotic livers were included and divided into the Testing and Validation groups. The modified CEUS LI-RADS was proposed, including downgrading of focal nodular hyperplasia with typical features. Diagnostic performance of the modified CEUS LI-RADS was assessed in the Testing group. In the Validation group, two radiologists with more than 9 y of CEUS experience (Experts) and two radiologists with less than 6 mo of CEUS experience (Novices) used both the modified CEUS LI-RADS and the WFUMB guideline to evaluate performance in diagnosis of the lesions.

RESULTS

LR-5 + M (combination of modified LR-5 and modified LR-M) revealed optimal performance with a sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of 99.3%, 81.6% and 0.904, respectively. Novices using the modified CEUS LI-RADS outperformed those using the WFUMB guideline (AUC: 0.858 vs. 0.767, p = 0.005). Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity and AUC of Novices were comparable to those of Experts using the modified CEUS LI-RADS (94.1%, 77.6% and 0.858 vs. 96.1%, 77.6% and 0.868 for experts, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The modified CEUS LI-RADS is a valuable method for distinguishing hepatic malignancy in patients without HCC risk factors. This is particularly beneficial for radiologists with limited CEUS expertise.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估改良的超声造影(CEUS)肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)在无已知肝细胞癌(HCC)危险因素患者中鉴别恶性肿瘤的能力,并比较不同CEUS经验水平的放射科医生使用该系统与世界医学与生物学超声联合会(WFUMB)指南的诊断准确性。

方法

纳入848例无肝炎感染且非肝硬化肝脏有870个病灶的个体,分为测试组和验证组。提出改良的CEUS LI-RADS,包括对具有典型特征的局灶性结节性增生进行降级。在测试组中评估改良的CEUS LI-RADS的诊断性能。在验证组中,两名有超过9年CEUS经验的放射科医生(专家)和两名CEUS经验少于6个月的放射科医生(新手)使用改良的CEUS LI-RADS和WFUMB指南评估病灶的诊断性能。

结果

LR-5 + M(改良LR-5和改良LR-M的组合)表现最佳,敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)分别为99.3%、81.6%和0.904。使用改良CEUS LI-RADS的新手的表现优于使用WFUMB指南的新手(AUC:0.858对0.767,p = 0.005)。此外,新手的敏感性、特异性和AUC与使用改良CEUS LI-RADS的专家相当(专家分别为96.1%、77.6%和0.868,新手分别为94.1%、77.6%和0.858)。

结论

改良的CEUS LI-RADS是鉴别无HCC危险因素患者肝脏恶性肿瘤的有价值方法。这对CEUS专业知识有限的放射科医生尤其有益。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Performance of Modified Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Patients Without Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison With World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guideline.改良型超声造影肝脏成像报告和数据系统在无肝细胞癌危险因素患者中的诊断性能:与世界医学和生物学超声联合会指南的比较
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024 Feb;50(2):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for the Characterization of Liver Nodules 20 mm or Smaller in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.CEUS LI-RADS 在肝癌风险患者中对 20mm 或更小的肝脏结节的特征诊断准确性。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):329-339. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191086. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
3
Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane With Modified Criteria Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS Version 2018 for Diagnosing HCC in High-Risk Patients.应用改良标准对比增强超声造影与 CT/MRI LI-RADS Version 2018 对高危人群 HCC 进行诊断的个体内比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 May;220(5):682-691. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28420. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane: Impact of Proposed Modified LI-RADS Criteria on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection.使用全氟丁烷的超声造影:拟议改良 LI-RADS 标准对肝细胞癌检测的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Sep;219(3):434-443. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27521. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
MR versus CEUS LI-RADS for Distinguishing Hepatocellular Carcinoma from other Hepatic Malignancies in High-Risk Patients.磁共振成像与超声造影 LI-RADS 对高危患者肝细胞癌与其他肝脏恶性肿瘤的鉴别诊断
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 May;47(5):1244-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.01.020. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
Comparison between M-score and LR-M in the reporting system of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS.M 评分与 LR-M 在对比增强超声 LI-RADS 报告系统中的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Aug;29(8):4249-4257. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5927-8. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: ESCULAP versus CEUS-LI-RADS.超声造影对肝细胞癌鉴别诊断的诊断准确性:爱克发与CEUS-LI-RADS对比
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Sep;29(9):1036-1044. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000916.
8
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Lights and shadows in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma diagnosis.超声造影肝脏影像报告与数据系统:在肝细胞癌和胆管细胞癌诊断中的优缺点。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 21;28(27):3488-3502. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3488.
9
Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System.对比增强超声与对比增强磁共振成像在肝脏影像报告与数据系统诊断局灶性肝脏病变中的比较。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 May;46(5):1216-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.01.023. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for categorising hepatic observations in patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.超声造影与 MRI 肝脏影像报告与数据系统(LI-RADS)对肝癌高危患者肝脏观察病灶分类的诊断效能。
Clin Radiol. 2021 Feb;76(2):161.e1-161.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of hepatic angiomyolipoma: comparison with AFP-negative and non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma.肝脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的超声造影特征:与甲胎蛋白阴性及非病毒性肝细胞癌的比较
Ultrasound Int Open. 2024 Jun 14;10:a23186654. doi: 10.1055/a-2318-6654. eCollection 2024.