• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种种植体下颌覆盖义齿在不同位置植入的种植体颊向应变量:体外 3D 打印模拟研究。

Crestal strain of two-implant mandibular overdentures with implants placed at different positions: An in vitro 3D printed simulation study.

机构信息

Associate Professor in Prosthodontics, Division of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Professor, Division of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Feb;131(2):281.e1-281.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.023. Epub 2023 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.023
PMID:37985307
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The 2-implant mandibular overdenture (2IMO) is a popular treatment for patients with mandibular edentulism. However, information on the influence of implant positions on crestal strain is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the crestal strain around 2 implants to support mandibular overdentures when placed at different positions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Edentulous mandibles were 3-dimensionally (3D) designed separately with 2 holes for implant placement at similar distances of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm from the midline, resulting in 4 study conditions. The complete denture models were 3D designed and printed from digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) images after scanning the patient's denture. Two 4.3×12-mm dummy implants were placed in the preplanned holes. Two linear strain gauges were attached on the crest of the mesial and distal side of each implant (CH1, CH2, CH3, and CH4) and connected to a computer to record the electrical signals. Male LOCATOR attachments were attached, the mucosal layer simulated, and the denture picked up with pink female nylon caps. A unilateral and bilateral force of 100 N was maintained for 10 seconds for each model in a universal testing machine while recording the maximum strains in the DCS-100A KYOWA computer software program. Data were analyzed by using 1-way analysis of variance, the Tukey post hoc test, and the paired t test (α=.05).

RESULTS

Under bilateral loading, the strain values indicated a trend with increasing distance between the implants with both right and left distal strain gauges (CH4 and CH1). The negative (-ve) values indicated the compressive force, and the positive (+ve) values indicated the tensile force being applied on the strain gauges. The strain values for CH4 ranged between -166.08 for the 5-mm and -251.58 for the 20-mm position; and for CH1 between -168.08 for the 5-mm and -297.83 for the 20-mm position. The remaining 2 mesial strain gauges for all 4 implant positions remained lower than for CH4 and CH1. Under unilateral-right loading, only the right-side distal strain gauge CH4 indicated the increasing trend in the strain values with -147.5 for the 5-mm, -157.17 for the 10-mm, -209.33 for the 15-mm, and -234.75 for the 20 mm position. The remaining 3 strain gauges CH3, CH2, and CH1 ranged between -28.33 and -107.17. For each position for both implants, significantly higher (P<.05) strain values were observed on the distal strain gauge channels CH4 and CH1 than on the mesial channels CH3 and CH2 under bilateral loading and on the right side under unilateral loading.

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-implant crestal strains in the 2IMO increased by increasing the distance of the implants from the midline. The stress values progressively increased from 5 to 10 mm to 15 to 20 mm from midline, represented as lateral incisor, canine, and premolar positions. The distal side of the implants exhibits higher strains than the mesial side of the implants.

摘要

问题陈述

下颌 2 种植体覆盖义齿(2IMO)是下颌无牙颌患者的一种常用治疗方法。然而,关于种植体位置对牙槽嵴应变影响的信息尚缺乏。

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估下颌覆盖义齿支持的 2 个种植体在不同位置时,牙槽嵴周围的应变情况。

材料和方法

分别对无牙下颌骨进行三维(3D)设计,在距离中线 5、10、15 和 20mm 处设计 2 个用于种植体放置的孔,共产生 4 种研究条件。从患者义齿的数字成像和通信(DICOM)图像中 3D 设计并打印完整的义齿模型。在预定的孔中放置 2 个 4.3×12mm 的假种植体。在每个种植体的近中和远侧牙槽嵴上(CH1、CH2、CH3 和 CH4)粘贴 2 个线性应变计,并连接到计算机以记录电信号。将 LOCATOR 附件安装在男性模型上,模拟黏膜层,并用粉红色女性尼龙帽拿起义齿。在万能试验机中,对每个模型维持 10 秒的单侧和双侧 100N 力,同时在 KYOWA DCS-100A 计算机软件程序中记录最大应变值。使用单向方差分析、Tukey 事后检验和配对 t 检验(α=.05)对数据进行分析。

结果

在双侧加载下,应变值表现出随种植体之间距离增加的趋势,右侧和左侧远侧应变计(CH4 和 CH1)均如此。负值(-ve)表示压缩力,正值(+ve)表示应变计上施加的张力。CH4 的应变值范围为 5mm 时的-166.08 至 20mm 时的-251.58;CH1 的应变值范围为 5mm 时的-168.08 至 20mm 时的-297.83。所有 4 种种植体位置的其余 2 个近侧应变计的应变值均低于 CH4 和 CH1。在单侧右侧加载下,只有右侧远侧应变计 CH4 的应变值表现出随 5mm 时的-147.5、10mm 时的-157.17、15mm 时的-209.33 和 20mm 时的-234.75 增加的趋势。其余 3 个应变计 CH3、CH2 和 CH1 的应变值范围为-28.33 至-107.17。对于每个位置的每个种植体,双侧加载时远侧应变计 CH4 和 CH1 的应变值明显高于近侧应变计 CH3 和 CH2(P<.05),单侧加载时右侧应变计 CH4 和 CH1 的应变值明显高于左侧(P<.05)。

结论

2IMO 中种植体周围的牙槽嵴应变随种植体距中线的距离增加而增加。应力值从中线的 5mm 到 10mm,再到 15mm 到 20mm 逐渐增加,代表侧切牙、尖牙和前磨牙位置。种植体的远侧部位比近侧部位表现出更高的应变。

相似文献

1
Crestal strain of two-implant mandibular overdentures with implants placed at different positions: An in vitro 3D printed simulation study.两种种植体下颌覆盖义齿在不同位置植入的种植体颊向应变量:体外 3D 打印模拟研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Feb;131(2):281.e1-281.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.023. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
2
Mandibular Denture Base Deformation with Locator and Ball Attachments of Implant-Retained Overdentures.种植覆盖义齿带有定位器和球附着体时下颌义齿基托的变形
J Prosthodont. 2016 Dec;25(8):656-664. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12356. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
Correlation of implant position and crestal bone loss in 2-implant mandibular overdentures with immediate loading protocols: A prospective clinical study.种植体即刻负载方案下下颌 2 枚种植体覆盖义齿的种植体位置与牙槽嵴骨丧失的相关性:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Oct;132(4):772-779. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
4
Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.两种标准种植体或 2 枚迷你种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿的生物力学行为:三维有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jan;125(1):138.e1-138.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
5
Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures.种植体数量对下颌种植覆盖义齿移动的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Mar;117(3):380-385. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
Effect of different implant positions on strain developed around four implants supporting a mandibular overdenture with rigid telescopic copings.不同种植体位置对采用刚性套筒冠支持下颌覆盖义齿的四颗种植体周围产生的应变的影响。
Quintessence Int. 2013 Oct;44(9):679-86. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a29187.
7
In vitro variation measurement of mandibular denture displacement resistance involving 1 to 3 implants.涉及 1 至 3 枚种植体的下颌义齿抗移位阻力的体外变异测量。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Mar;121(3):492-497. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.036. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
8
A comparative study to evaluate microstrain of low-profile attachment associated with and without bar connection in implant assisted mandibular overdenture (in vitro study).一种评估种植体支持下颌覆盖义齿中低轮廓附着体与杆连接和无杆连接时微应变的对比研究(体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):982. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03702-8.
9
Resilient Stud Versus Bar Attachments for Inclined Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures. An In Vitro Study of Loading and Dislodging Strains.用于支持下颌覆盖义齿的倾斜种植体的弹性柱与杆附着体。加载和脱位应变的体外研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Sep-Oct;37(5):982-988. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9560.
10
Peri-implant strain around mesially inclined two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments.使用Locator附着体的近中倾斜双种植体支持下颌覆盖义齿周围的种植体周应变
J Oral Sci. 2017 Dec 27;59(4):483-490. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.16-0626. Epub 2017 Oct 31.